...
首页> 外文期刊>Eye & contact lens >Comparison of the efficacy of two lipid emulsion eyedrops in increasing tear film lipid layer thickness.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy of two lipid emulsion eyedrops in increasing tear film lipid layer thickness.

机译:比较两种脂质乳剂滴眼液增加泪膜脂质层厚度的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The lipid layer of the tear film is critical to maintaining the thickness of the multilayered tear film. This study was designed to determine whether a single drop of Refresh Dry Eye Therapy or Soothe, both lipid emulsion eyedrops, significantly increased the lipid layer thickness (LLT) of patients with self-reported dry eyes and thin lipid layers. METHODS: Lipid layer interference patterns were used to quantify the LLT of both eyes of eligible patients before and after test drop instillation. Patients (n=41) reporting dry eye symptoms and having baseline LLT of no more than 75 nm received 40 microL of Refresh Dry Eye Therapy in one eye and 40 microL of Soothe in the contralateral eye. After instillation, LLT was quantified at 1, 5, and 15 minutes. LLT after drop instillation was averaged for the three time points. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard error baseline LLT was 59.6 +/- 1.7 nm for eyes treated with Refresh Dry Eye Therapy and 61.5 +/- 1.6 nm for eyes treated with Soothe. These means were not significantly different (P>0.05). The overall mean LLT after drop instillation was 83.2 +/- 3.6 nm for Refresh Dry Eye Therapy (P<0.0001) and 121.5 +/- 3.8 nm for Soothe (P<0.0001). The mean LLT increase from Soothe (60.0 nm) was significantly greater than that from Refresh Dry Eye Therapy (23.6 nm) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a lipid emulsion eyedrop will increase LLT and benefit patients with deficient lipid layers who experience dry eye symptoms. Although both products are lipid emulsions, one drop of Soothe essentially doubled LLT and provided a mean increase in LLT that was 2.5 times greater than that of Refresh Dry Eye Therapy.
机译:目的:泪膜的脂质层对于维持多层泪膜的厚度至关重要。这项研究旨在确定使用单滴的“干眼疗法”或“舒缓”这两种脂质乳剂滴眼剂,是否会显着增加自我报告的干眼和薄脂层患者的脂质层厚度(LLT)。方法:采用脂质层干涉图样定量滴眼液滴注前后合格患者的双眼的LLT。报告干眼症状且基线LLT不超过75 nm的患者(n = 41)在一只眼睛中接受40 microL的新鲜干眼疗法,在对侧眼中接受40 microL的Soothe。滴注后,在1、5和15分钟对LLT进行定量。滴注后的LLT在三个时间点取平均值。结果:Refresh干眼疗法治疗的眼睛的平均+/-标准误差基线LLT为59.6 +/- 1.7 nm,而Soothe治疗的眼睛的平均+/-标准误差LLT为61.5 +/- 1.6 nm。这些均值没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。滴眼滴眼后的总体平均LLT(对于刷新干眼疗法)为83.2 +/- 3.6 nm(P <0.0001),对于Soothe(P <0.0001)为121.5 +/- 3.8 nm。 Soothe(60.0 nm)带来的平均LLT增幅显着大于Refresh干眼疗法(23.6 nm)带来的LLT增幅(P <0.0001)。结论:使用脂质乳剂滴眼液可增加LLT并有益于患有干眼症状的脂质层不足的患者。尽管两种产品都是脂质乳剂,但一滴Soothe可使LLT实质上翻倍,并且LLT的平均增加量比Refresh干眼疗法的平均增加量高2.5倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号