首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical endocrinology and diabetes: Official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association >Glucose Control is Not Improved by Accelerating Gastric Emptying in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Gastroparesis. A Pilot Study with Cisapride as a Model Drug.
【24h】

Glucose Control is Not Improved by Accelerating Gastric Emptying in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Gastroparesis. A Pilot Study with Cisapride as a Model Drug.

机译:加速1型糖尿病和胃轻瘫患者的胃排空不能改善血糖控制。以西沙必利为模型药物的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present pilot study investigated whether acceleration of gastric emptying in patients with type 1 diabetes and delayed gastric emptying (a possible cause of poorly controlled diabetes) improves long-term glucose control. Eight outpatients with diabetes (age 28 - 63 years, mean diabetes duration 24.6 +/- 6.0 years) and delayed gastric emptying of radio-opaque markers were randomised and treated, for three months each, with a prokinetic drug (cisapride 20 mg twice daily) and placebo. Mean capillary glucose, glucose variability (M-values, MAGE), fructosamine, and HbA1c were assessed. Gastric emptying of a solid standard meal was measured by scintigraphy after each treatment period. Chronic administration of a prokinetic drug resulted in improved solid gastric emptying (percentage residual) at 120 min (p = 0.025). The percentage residual was 43.6 +/- 9.6 % during prokinetic treatment and 59.7 +/- 9.9 % during placebo (standard error of paired differences 5.7 %). The mean gastric emptying time (t/2) of solids was 88 min during prokinetic treatment compared to 113 min in the placebo arm (SE of paired differences 14 min; p = 0.09). Mean blood glucose values (9.0 +/- 3.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 3.7 mmol/l), daily glucose variability (MAGE 6.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 6.3 +/- 1.6 mmol/l; M-value 15.2 +/- 2.5 vs. 13.9 +/- 4.5), and HbA1c at 3 months (7.8 +/- 1.1 % vs. 7.6 +/- 1.0 %) were not statistically different between prokinetic drug and placebo treatment. Similarly, the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes (
机译:当前的先导研究调查了1型糖尿病患者胃排空的加速和胃排空的延迟(可能是糖尿病控制不佳的可能原因)是否可以改善长期血糖控制。将八名糖尿病门诊患者(年龄在28-63岁,平均糖尿病持续时间24.6 +/- 6.0年)和胃不透射线标记物排空延迟,随机分配并用促运动药(西沙必利20 mg,每天两次,每次3个月)治疗)和安慰剂。评估平均毛细血管葡萄糖,葡萄糖变异性(M值,MAGE),果糖胺和HbA1c。在每个治疗期后通过闪烁显像法测量固体标准餐的胃排空。长期服用促运动药可改善120分钟时的固体胃排空(残留百分比)(p = 0.025)。在促动治疗期间残留百分比为43.6 +/- 9.6%,在安慰剂治疗期间为59.7 +/- 9.9%(配对差异的标准误为5.7%)。促性药物治疗期间,固体的平均胃排空时间(t / 2)为88分钟,而安慰剂组为113分钟(配对差异SE为14分钟; p = 0.09)。平均血糖值(9.0 +/- 3.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 3.7 mmol / l),每日葡萄糖变异性(MAGE 6.8 +/- 1.3 vs. 6.3 +/- 1.6 mmol / l; M值15.2 +/- 2.5与13.9 +/- 4.5的对比)以及3个月时的HbA1c(7.8 +/- 1.1%与7.6 +/- 1.0%)在促运动药物和安慰剂治疗之间无统计学差异。同样,两组降血糖发作的频率(≤3 mmol / l)也没有差异(78比68)。我们的初步研究表明,长期排空胃排空对糖尿病性胃轻瘫患者的总体血糖控制,血糖波动幅度和降血糖发作没有影响。因此,我们不建议将胃排空加速作为1型糖尿病患者的“脆性糖尿病”治疗策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号