首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical endocrinology and diabetes: Official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association >Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the Switch pil
【24h】

Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the Switch pil

机译:与以前长期接受常规胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者相比,每日一次甘精胰岛素加一或两种口服降糖药与持续预混人胰岛素的疗效和治疗满意度:Switch pil

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Addition of the long-acting basal human insulin analogue insulin glargine (LANTUS) to the treatment regimen of patients with inadequate glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) alone has previously been evaluated as effective, safe and convenient. This pilot study aimed to establish whether insulin glargine plus OADs is effective in Type 2 diabetes patients previously poorly controlled on premixed insulin therapy. METHODS: In an open, controlled, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre, 16-week pilot study, 52 patients (age 65.6+/-9.2 years; diabetes duration 15.3+/-7.6 years; insulin therapy duration 4.2+/-1.7 years, body mass index 31.4+/-2.9 kg/m2) with Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c>or=8.0%) on premixed human insulin (75/25 or 70/30) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride (Group A; n=17), insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (Group B; n=18) or premixed insulin (Group C; n=17). Glycaemic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia were evaluated. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased significantly from baseline in Groups A and B, but not in Group C; (Group A: 7.87+/-0.66%, -0.35%, p=0.013; Group B: 7.44+/-0.92%, -0.69%, p=0.0057; Group C: 7.83+/-1.13%, -0.25%, p=0.32). There were no between-treatment differences at endpoint in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose or symptomatic hypoglycaemia (mean events/patient: Group A, 2.2; Group B, 2.3; Group C, 2.0). At endpoint, 88% of patients in Group A, 81% in Group B and 94% in Group C opted to continue with their assigned regimen. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is the first prospective study to show that switching from premixed insulin to insulin glargine plus OAD treatment resulted in similar glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction. The results support the need for prospective examination in a larger-scale clinical study in patients with long-standing Type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glycaemic control previously using a conventional premixed insulin regimen.
机译:背景:长期口服基础人胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素(LANTUS)加到口服降糖药(OADs)血糖控制不足的患者的治疗方案中,以前曾被评估为有效,安全和方便的方法。这项前瞻性研究旨在确定甘精胰岛素加OAD对先前混合胰岛素治疗控制不良的2型糖尿病患者是否有效。方法:在一项开放,对照,随机分组的平行研究,单中心,为期16周的试验研究中,有52名患者(年龄65.6 +/- 9.2岁;糖尿病病程15.3 +/- 7.6年;胰岛素治疗病程4.2 + / -1.7岁,将预混合人胰岛素(75/25或70/30)的2型糖尿病(HbA1c>或= 8.0%)的体重指数31.4 +/- 2.9 kg / m2随机分配到每天一次的甘精胰岛素加格列美脲(A组; n = 17),甘精胰岛素加格列美脲和二甲双胍(B组; n = 18)或预混胰岛素(C组; n = 17)。评估血糖控制和低血糖发生率。结果:A和B组的HbA1c较基线显着下降,但C组没有; (A组:7.87 +/- 0.66%,-0.35%,p = 0.013; B组:7.44 +/- 0.92%,-0.69%,p = 0.0057; C组:7.83 +/- 1.13%,-0.25% ,p = 0.32)。 HbA1c,空腹血糖,平均每日血糖或症状性低血糖的终点之间无治疗间差异(平均事件/患者:A组,2.2; B组,2.3; C组,2.0)。终点时,A组88%,B组81%和C组94%的患者选择继续他们指定的方案。结论:这项前瞻性研究是第一个前瞻性研究,表明从预混合胰岛素改为甘精胰岛素加OAD治疗可达到相似的血糖控制和治疗满意度。这些结果支持对长期存在的2型糖尿病和先前未采用常规预混合胰岛素治疗的血糖控制欠佳的患者进行大规模临床研究的前瞻性检查的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号