...
首页> 外文期刊>Exotic DVM >Contrasting Views: Use of Auricular Vessels for Venipuncture and Catheterization in Rabbits
【24h】

Contrasting Views: Use of Auricular Vessels for Venipuncture and Catheterization in Rabbits

机译:相反的观点:在兔的静脉穿刺和导管插入术中使用耳廓血管

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The use of the auricular vessels in rabbits is somewhat controversial, as there are reports of vessel damage and pinna necrosis secondary to use of these vessels, for either phlebotomy or injection of fluids and/ or therapeutic agents. A number of well known exotic mammal references mention necrosis as a possible complication but are far from agreement. One lists 'Venipuncture" in general as risky; one sites that phlebotomy of the central auricular artery carries risk but catheterization of the marginal vein is acceptable; the third cautions against catheterization of the marginal vein. None of these sources provides documentation of risk, indicating reports may be anecdotal only. Therefore, complication rate and actual risk is likely unknown.
机译:在兔中使用耳道血管引起一定争议,因为有报道称在使用这些血管进行静脉放血或输注液体和/或治疗药物后,血管受损和耳廓坏死。许多众所周知的外来哺乳动物参考文献都提到坏死是一种可能的并发症,但并不一致。一处一般将“静脉穿刺”列为有风险;一处中耳静脉切开术会带来风险,但可以接受边缘静脉置管;第三处警告不要对边缘静脉置管,但这些资料均未提供风险证明,表明报告可能只是轶事,因此并发症发生率和实际风险可能未知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号