...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical endocrinology and diabetes: Official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association >Results of a randomised controlled cross-over trial on the effect of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGMS) on glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
【24h】

Results of a randomised controlled cross-over trial on the effect of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGMS) on glycaemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

机译:一项关于连续皮下葡萄糖监测(CGMS)对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制效果的随机对照试验的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility and the influence on glycaemic control of continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS) in young patients with type 1 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: A double-blinded, cross-over study was performed in 30 children (median age 11.1 years [range: 2.3 - 16.3], diabetes duration 2.1 years [0.2 - 7.1]). Patients were randomised into an open (A) or blind study arm (B). Both groups performed standardised self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) and received CGMS at the beginning of the study, at 3 and 6 months, each. In the blinded arm, patients and investigator were concealed from CGMS data. After 3 months, open and blinded study arms crossed over. Average glucose values and area under the glucose curve (AUC) per 24 h, above 180 and below 60 mg/dl were calculated from CGMS. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at each study point. RESULTS: Despite comparable clinical characteristics between the 15 patients of each arm, mean HbA1c was slightly lower in arm A than in B at baseline (7.8 +/-1.2 % vs. 8.4 +/- 1.1 %, p = 0.148), at 3 months (7.8 +/- 1.1 % vs. 8.3 +/- 1.1 %, p = 0.233), and significantly lower at 6 months (7.6 +/- 1.1 % vs. 8.5 +/- 0.9 %, p = 0.026). However, no significant change of HbA1c occurred within each arm (A, p = 0.183 and B, p = 0.823), irrespectively whether CGMS data were blinded or not. Likewise, mean glucose and hyper- or hypoglycaemia values did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In this setting, CGMS did not decisively influence glycaemic control of a total study cohort. More frequent use of CGMS at shorter intervals in single patients with hyper- or hypoglycaemic problems may be of greater value than SMBG.
机译:目的:探讨年轻1型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测(CGMS)的可行性及其对血糖控制的影响。设计与方法:对30名儿童(中位年龄11.1岁[范围:2.3-16.3],糖尿病持续时间2.1岁[0.2-7.1])进行了双盲,交叉研究。将患者随机分为开放式研究组(A)或盲人研究组(B)。两组均进行标准化的自我监测血糖(SMBG),并在研究开始时(分别为3个月和6个月)接受CGMS。在盲人的手臂中,患者和研究者均未从CGMS数据中隐藏。 3个月后,开放式和盲式研究臂交叉。通过CGMS计算每24小时,高于180mg和低于60mg / dl的平均葡萄糖值和葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC)。在每个研究点测量血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)。结果:尽管每组15例患者的临床特征具有可比性,但在基线时,A组的平均HbA1c略低于B组(7.8 +/- 1.2%与8.4 +/- 1.1%,p = 0.148)。个月(7.8 +/- 1.1%vs. 8.3 +/- 1.1%,p = 0.233),并在6个月时显着降低(7.6 +/- 1.1%vs. 8.5 +/- 0.9%,p = 0.026)。但是,无论CGMS数据是否为盲,每个组内HbA1c均未发生明显变化(A,p = 0.183,B,p = 0.823)。同样,平均血糖和高血糖或低血糖值也没有明显变化。结论:在这种情况下,CGMS并没有决定性地影响整个研究队列的血糖控制。在患有高血糖或低血糖问题的单身患者中,更短间隔地更频繁地使用CGMS可能比SMBG具有更大的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号