...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Motor planning ability is not related to lesion side or functional manual ability in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
【24h】

Motor planning ability is not related to lesion side or functional manual ability in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

机译:偏瘫性脑瘫患儿的运动计划能力与病变侧或功能手动能力无关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Optimal task performance requires anticipatory planning to select the most appropriate movement strategy. There is conflicting evidence for hemispheric specialisation of motor planning, with some suggesting left hemisphere dominance, claiming that children with right hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP) are therefore disproportionally affected. An alternative view is that there is a positive relationship between functional ability (rather than side of lesion) and motor planning skill. We aimed to compare children with right and left HCP on motor planning ability and to explore its relationship with functional manual ability. Participants were 76 children with HCP (40 left HCP; 30 female), aged 4-15 years (Mean 9.09, SD 2.94). Motor planning was assessed using a measure of end-state comfort, which involved turning a hexagonal handle 180 without readjusting grasp. This is difficult, or in some cases impossible, to achieve unless an appropriate initial grasp is adopted. Children completed 24 turns (12 clockwise), which were video recorded for offline scoring. Functional manual ability was assessed with the ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire, completed by parents. Contrary to the existing literature, no differences were observed between right and left HCP. However, a significant interaction between direction of turn and side of hemiplegia indicated a preferential bias for turns in the medial direction, consistent with the "medial over lateral advantage". There was no relationship between functional ability and motor planning. Therefore, motor planning may not be a priority for therapeutic intervention to improve functional ability in HCP.
机译:最佳的任务绩效需要预先计划以选择最合适的运动策略。关于运动计划的半球专业化有相互矛盾的证据,其中一些暗示左半球占优势,声称患有右半身麻痹的儿童因此受到不成比例的影响。另一种观点认为,功能能力(而不是病变侧)与运动计划技能之间存在正相关关系。我们旨在比较左右HCP的儿童的运动计划能力,并探讨其与功能性手动能力的关系。参与者为76名HCP儿童(40名左HCP; 30名女性),年龄4-15岁(平均9.09,SD 2.94)。使用最终状态舒适度的方法来评估运动计划,该方法包括在不重新调整抓地力的情况下将六角形手柄旋转180。除非采取适当的初步把握,否则这是很难实现的,或者在某些情况下甚至是不可能实现的。孩子们完成了24个回合(顺时针旋转12个),并录制了视频以供离线评分。父母填写的ABILHAND-Kids问卷对功能性手动功能进行了评估。与现有文献相反,左右HCP之间未观察到差异。但是,转弯方向和偏瘫一侧之间的显着相互作用表明,在内侧方向上偏向于侧弯,这与“内侧胜过外侧优势”一致。功能能力和运动计划之间没有关系。因此,运动计划可能不是提高HCP功能能力的治疗干预措施的优先重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号