首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >The time course of alerting effect over orienting in the attention network test.
【24h】

The time course of alerting effect over orienting in the attention network test.

机译:在注意力网络测试中,警报效果超过定向的时间过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present experiment we used a version of the attention network test (ANT) similar to that of Callejas et al. (Exp Brain Res 167:27-37, 2005) to assess the Posner's attention networks (alerting, orienting and conflict), and their interactions. We observed shorter reaction times with alerting tone than with no alerting tone trials (the alerting effect); with cued than with uncued trials (the orienting effect); and with congruent than with incongruent trials (the conflict effect). These results replicate previous findings with the ANT. We also manipulated cue-target interval at five stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) values (100, 300, 500, 800, and 1,200 ms) to trace the alerting network influence over the orienting network. The SOA manipulation showed that cuing effects peaked at 300 ms SOA irrespective of whether an alerting tone was present or not, and the alerting tone improved the cuing effect equally for 100-500 SOAs, but it did not at the longest 800-1,200 ms SOAs. These results suggest that alerting improves rather than accelerates orienting effects, a result that agrees with data from neuropsychological rehabilitation of parietal patients with spatial bias.
机译:在本实验中,我们使用了类似于Callejas等人的注意力网络测试(ANT)版本。 (Exp Brain Res 167:27-37,2005)评估Posner的注意力网络(警报,定向和冲突)及其相互作用。我们观察到带有提示音的反应时间比没有提示音的试验(提示效果)要短。有提示的情况比没有提示的情况(定向效果);与一致的审判相比,不一致的审判(冲突影响)。这些结果与ANT重复了以前的发现。我们还以五个刺激起始异步(SOA)值(100、300、500、800和1200 ms)操纵提示目标间隔,以跟踪警报网络对定向网络的影响。 SOA操作显示,无论是否存在提示音,提示效果都在300 ms SOA达到峰值,并且提示音对100-500 SOA同样提高了提示效果,但最长没有达到800-1,200 ms SOA 。这些结果表明,警戒会改善而不是加速定向作用,这一结果与患有空间偏倚的壁瘫患者的神经心理康复数据一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号