...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.
【24h】

Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

机译:非平稳环境中的人类空间定向:自我转向感知与周围运动检测之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated the relative weighting of vestibular, optokinetic and podokinetic (foot and leg proprioceptive) cues for the perception of self-turning in an environment which was either stationary (concordant stimulation) or moving (discordant stimulation) and asked whether cue weighting changes if subjects (Ss) detect a discordance. Ss (N = 18) stood on a turntable inside an optokinetic drum and turned either passively (turntable rotating) or actively in space at constant velocities of 15, 30, or 60 degrees /s. Sensory discordance was introduced by simultaneous rotations of the environment (drum and/or turntable) at +/-{5, 10, 20, 40, 80}% of self-turning velocity. In one experiment, Ss were to detect these rotations (i.e. the sensory discordance), and in a second experiment they reported perceived angular self-displacement. Discordant optokinetic cues were better detected, and more heavily weighted for self-turning perception, than discordant podokinetic cues. Within Ss, weights did not depend on whether a discordance was detected or not. Across Ss, optokinetic weights varied over a large range and were negatively correlated with the detection scores: the more perception was influenced by discordant optokinetic cues, the poorer was the detection score; no such correlation was found among the podokinetic results. These results are interpreted in terms of a "self-referential" model that makes the following assumptions: (1) a weighted average of the available sensory cues both determines turning perception and serves as a reference to which the optokinetic cue is compared; (2) a discordance is detected if the difference between reference and optokinetic cue exceeds some threshold; (3) the threshold value corresponds to about the same multiple of sensory uncertainty in all Ss. With these assumptions the model explains the observed relation between optokinetic weight and detection score.
机译:我们调查了前庭,视动和足动(足和腿本体感受)提示在相对静止或稳定(刺激刺激)或移动(不一致刺激)环境下自我转向的相对权重,并询问提示权重是否改变了受试者(Ss)检测到不一致。 Ss(N = 18)放在光动力鼓内的转盘上,以15、30或60度/ s的恒定速度在空间中被动旋转(转盘旋转)或主动旋转。通过同时旋转环境(鼓和/或转盘)以自转速度的+/- {5,10,20,40,80}%引入感觉不一致。在一个实验中,Ss将检测这些旋转(即感觉不一致),在第二个实验中,他们报告了感知到的角度自位移。与不一致的足动学提示相比,可以更好地检测出不一致的视动学提示,并且对自我转向感知的权重也更大。在Ss中,权重不取决于是否检测到不一致。在整个Ss中,视动体重在很大范围内变化,并且与检测分数呈负相关:不协调的视动线索对感知的影响越大,检测分数就越差;在人体运动结果中未发现这种相关性。这些结果根据“自我参照”模型进行解释,该模型做出以下假设:(1)可用感官提示的加权平均值既确定转弯感知,又用作与视动提示进行比较的参考; (2)如果参考和视动提示之间的差异超过某个阈值,则检测到不一致。 (3)阈值对应于所有Ss中感官不确定性的大约相同倍数。基于这些假设,该模型解释了视动重与检测得分之间观察到的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号