...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study.
【24h】

Inter- versus intramodal integration in sensorimotor synchronization: a combined behavioral and magnetoencephalographic study.

机译:感觉运动同步中的模态间和模态内整合:行为和磁脑图学的组合研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the temporal occurrence of the pacing signal is predictable in sensorimotor synchronization tasks, normal subjects perform on-the-beat-tapping to an isochronous auditory metronome with an anticipatory error. This error originates from an intermodal task, that is, subjects have to bring information from the auditory and tactile modality to coincide. The aim of the present study was to illuminate whether the synchronization error is a finding specific to an intermodal timing task and whether the underlying cortical mechanisms are modality-specific or supramodal. We collected behavioral data and cortical evoked responses by magneto-encephalography (MEG) during performance of cross- and unimodal tapping-tasks. As expected, subjects showed negative asynchrony in performing an auditorily paced tapping task. However, no asynchrony emerged during tactile pacing, neither during pacing at the opposite finger nor at the toe. Analysis of cortical signals resulted in a three dipole model best explaining tap-contingent activity in all three conditions. The temporal behavior of the sources was similar between the conditions and, thus, modality independent. The localization of the two earlier activated sources was modality-independent as well whereas location of the third source varied with modality. In the auditory pacing condition it was localized in contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, during tactile pacing it was localized in contralateral posterior parietal cortex. In previous studies with auditory pacing the functional role of this third source was contradictory: A special temporal coupling pattern argued for involvement of the source in evaluating the temporal distance between tap and click whereas subsequent data gave no evidence for such an interpretation. Present data shed new light on this question by demonstrating differences between modalities in the localization of the third source with similar temporal behavior.
机译:尽管起搏信号的暂时出现在感觉运动同步任务中是可预见的,但正常对象会在有预见错误的情况下对等时听觉节拍器进行拍打。此错误源于联运任务,也就是说,受试者必须从听觉和触觉方式中获取信息以使其重合。本研究的目的是阐明同步误差是否是特定于联运计时任务的发现,以及潜在的皮质机制是特定于运输方式还是超运输方式。我们收集了行为数据和磁脑电图(MEG)在执行交叉和单峰攻丝任务时的皮质诱发反应。如预期的那样,受试者在执行听觉上有节奏的敲击任务时表现出负的异步性。但是,在触觉起搏期间,无论是在对指还是在脚趾的起搏过程中都没有出现异步。皮层信号的分析产生了一个三偶极模型,可以最好地解释在所有三种情况下的自来势活动。在条件之间,源的时间行为相似,因此与模式无关。两个较早激活的源的本地化也与模式无关,而第三个源的位置随模式而变化。在听觉起搏情况下,它定位在对侧初级体感皮质中,而在触觉起搏过程中,它定位在对侧后顶叶皮质中。在先前的听觉起搏研究中,第三个来源的功能作用是矛盾的:一种特殊的时间耦合模式认为该来源参与了评估点击和点击之间的时间距离,而随后的数据则没有这种解释的证据。目前的数据通过证明在具有类似时间行为的第三源的本地化方式之间的差异,为这一问题提供了新的思路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号