首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Participation, Social Cohesion and the Challenges in the Governance Process: An Analysis of a Post-World War II Neighbourhood in the Netherlands
【24h】

Participation, Social Cohesion and the Challenges in the Governance Process: An Analysis of a Post-World War II Neighbourhood in the Netherlands

机译:参与,社会凝聚力和治理过程中的挑战:对第二次世界大战后荷兰社区的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past 5 years, several scientific articles have been written on the theme of social cohesion in urban neighbourhoods. In most cases this literature focuses on the loss of social cohesion in these areas. In addition, many problems, such as a declining quality of life, physical deterioration, and social isolation have been related to a lack of social cohesion. Another set of articles has increased our knowledge on urban governance. While this work adds considerably to our general understanding of the changing role of the organization of urban social policy and its effects on neighbourhoods, there has been little attempt to date to analyse how policy-makers experience this relationship. This experience is crucial, because it is the basis of policy practice and action. The first aim here is therefore to analyse to what extent policy-makers experience an effect of participation on social cohesion, although the number of participants is relatively low. The empirical findings show that policy-makers do experience a positive effect of participation on the various dimensions of social cohesion. The second aim of the paper is to explain the level of participation by evaluating the governance process. The analyses indicate that the policy-makers face challenges related to the diversity of the population in the participation process, as well as reconciling different needs within decision-making processes.
机译:在过去的五年中,以城市社区的社会凝聚力为主题的几篇科学文章已经发表。在大多数情况下,该文献集中于这些地区社会凝聚力的丧失。此外,许多问题,例如生活质量下降,身体恶化和社会孤立,都与缺乏社会凝聚力有关。另一组文章增加了我们对城市治理的知识。尽管这项工作大大增加了我们对城市社会政策组织的角色变化及其对居民区影响的一般理解,但迄今为止,几乎没有尝试分析政策制定者如何体验这种关系。这种经验至关重要,因为它是政策实践和行动的基础。因此,这里的首要目标是分析决策者在多大程度上经历了参与对社会凝聚力的影响,尽管参与者的数量相对较少。实证结果表明,决策者确实在社会凝聚力的各个方面都经历了积极的参与。本文的第二个目的是通过评估治理过程来解释参与程度。分析表明,决策者在参与过程中面临与人口多样性有关的挑战,并且在决策过程中调和不同需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号