首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
【24h】

Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.

机译:前列腺癌:盆腔相控阵线圈与局部直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈的局部分期准确性比较。使用直肠内线圈MR成像对前列腺癌的局部分期准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the visibility of anatomical details and prostate cancer local staging performance of pelvic phased-array coil and integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil MR imaging, with histologic analysis serving as the reference standard. MR imaging was performed in 81 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer, prior to radical prostatectomy, on a 1.5T scanner. T2-weighted fast spin echo images of the prostate were obtained using phased-array coil and endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Prospectively, one radiologist, retrospectively, two radiologists and two less experienced radiologists working in consensus, evaluated and scored all endorectal-pelvic phased-array imaging, with regard to visibility of anatomical details and local staging. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed. Anatomical details of the overall prostate were significantly better evaluated using the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil setup (P<0.05). The overall local staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the pelvic phased-array coil was 59% (48/81), 56% (20/36) and 62% (28/45), and for the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils 83% (67/81), 64% (23/36) and 98% (44/45) respectively, for the prospective reader. Accuracy and specificity were significantly better with endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils (P<0.05). The overall staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for the retrospective readers were 78-79% (P<0.05), 56-58% and 96%, for the endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Area under the ROC curve (Az) was significantly higher for endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils (Az=0.74) compared to pelvic phased-array coil (Az=0.57), for the prospective reader. The use of endorectal-pelvic phased array coils resulted in significant improvement of anatomic details, extracapsular extension accuracy and specificity. Overstaging is reduced significantly with equal sensitivity when an endorectal-pelvic phased-array coil is used.
机译:为了比较盆腔相控阵线圈和整合的直肠内-盆腔相控阵线圈MR成像的解剖学细节和前列腺癌的局部分期性能,以组织学分析作为参考标准。在进行前列腺癌根治术之前,在1.5T扫描仪上对81例经活检证实为前列腺癌的连续患者进行MR成像。使用相控阵线圈和直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈获得前列腺的T2加权快速自旋回波图像。前瞻性地,一名放射线医师,两名放射线医师和两名经验不足的放射线医师以共识的方式,就解剖学细节的可视性和局部分期对所有直肠内盆腔相控阵成像进行了评估和评分。进行接收者操作员特征(ROC)分析。使用直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈设置显着更好地评估了整个前列腺的解剖学细节(P <0.05)。骨盆相控阵线圈的整体局部分期准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为59%(48/81),56%(20/36)和62%(28/45),以及直肠内-盆腔相控阵对于预期的读者来说,分别占83%(67/81),64%(23/36)和98%(44/45)。直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈的准确性和特异性明显更好(P <0.05)。对于直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈,回顾性阅读器的总体分期准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为78-79%(P <0.05),56-58%和96%。对于准读者,直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈(Az = 0.74)的ROC曲线下面积(Az)显着高于盆腔相控阵线圈(Az = 0.57)。直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈的使用显着改善了解剖学细节,囊外延伸的准确性和特异性。当使用直肠内盆腔相控阵线圈时,以相同的灵敏度显着减少了过度分期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号