...
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
【24h】

Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

机译:比较心电图和心电图触发的2D SSFP CINE MR成像在1.5 T和3.0 T时的左心室功能评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: As high-field cardiac MRI (CMR) becomes more widespread the propensity of ECG to interference from electromagnetic fields (EMF) and to magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) effects increases and with it the motivation for a CMR triggering alternative. This study explores the suitability of acoustic cardiac triggering (ACT) for left ventricular (LV) function assessment in healthy subjects (n = 14). METHODS: Quantitative analysis of 2D CINE steady-state free precession (SSFP) images was conducted to compare ACT's performance with vector ECG (VCG). Endocardial border sharpness (EBS) was examined paralleled by quantitative LV function assessment. RESULTS: Unlike VCG, ACT provided signal traces free of interference from EMF or MHD effects. In the case of correct R-wave recognition, VCG-triggered 2D CINE SSFP was immune to cardiac motion effects-even at 3.0 T. However, VCG-triggered 2D SSFP CINE imaging was prone to cardiac motion and EBS degradation if R-wave misregistration occurred. ACT-triggered acquisitions yielded LV parameters (end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular mass (LVM)) comparable with those derived from VCG-triggered acquisitions (1.5 T: ESV(VCG) = (56 +/- 17) ml, EDV(VCG) = (151 +/- 32) ml, LVM(VCG) = (97 +/- 27) g, SV(VCG) = (94 +/- 19) ml, EF(VCG) = (63 +/- 5)% cf. ESV(ACT) = (56 +/- 18) ml, EDV(ACT) = (147 +/- 36) ml, LVM(ACT) = (102 +/- 29) g, SV(ACT) = (91 +/- 22) ml, EF(ACT) = (62 +/- 6)%; 3.0 T: ESV(VCG) = (55 +/- 21) ml, EDV(VCG) = (151 +/- 32) ml, LVM(VCG) = (101 +/- 27) g, SV(VCG) = (96 +/- 15) ml, EF(VCG) = (65 +/- 7)% cf. ESV(ACT) = (54 +/- 20) ml, EDV(ACT) = (146 +/- 35) ml, LVM(ACT) = (101 +/- 30) g, SV(ACT) = (92 +/- 17) ml, EF(ACT) = (64 +/- 6)%). CONCLUSIONS: ACT's intrinsic insensitivity to interference from electromagnetic fields renders it suitable for clinical CMR.
机译:目的:随着高场心脏MRI(CMR)的广泛使用,ECG对电磁场(EMF)干扰和磁流体动力学(MHD)效应的倾向也随之增加,并激发了CMR触发替代疗法的动机。这项研究探讨了健康受试者(n = 14)中声心触发(ACT)对左心室(LV)功能评估的适用性。方法:对2D CINE稳态自由进动(SSFP)图像进行了定量分析,以比较ACT与矢量ECG(VCG)的性能。通过定量左室功能评估平行检查心内膜边界清晰度。结果:与VCG不同,ACT提供的信号迹线不受EMF或MHD效应的干扰。在正确识别R波的情况下,VCG触发的2D CINE SSFP即使在3.0 T时也不受心脏运动的影响。但是,如果R波重合失调,VCG触发的2D SSFP CINE成像容易出现心脏运动和EBS退化发生了。 ACT触发的采集所产生的LV参数(舒张末期容积(EDV),收缩末期容积(ESV),中风容积(SV),射血分数(EF)和左心室重量(LVM))与从VCG-触发采集(1.5 T:ESV(VCG)=(56 +/- 17)ml,EDV(VCG)=(151 +/- 32)ml,LVM(VCG)=(97 +/- 27)g,SV( VCG)=(94 +/- 19)ml,EF(VCG)=(63 +/- 5)%参见ESV(ACT)=(56 +/- 18)ml,EDV(ACT)=(147 + / -36)ml,LVM(ACT)=(102 +/- 29)g,SV(ACT)=(91 +/- 22)ml,EF(ACT)=(62 +/- 6)%; 3.0 T: ESV(VCG)=(55 +/- 21)ml,EDV(VCG)=(151 +/- 32)ml,LVM(VCG)=(101 +/- 27)g,SV(VCG)=(96 + /-15)ml,EF(VCG)=(65 +/- 7)%参见ESV(ACT)=(54 +/- 20)ml,EDV(ACT)=(146 +/- 35)ml,LVM (ACT)=(101 +/- 30)g,SV(ACT)=(92 +/- 17)ml,EF(ACT)=(64 +/- 6)%)。结论:ACT对电磁场干扰的固有不敏感性使其适用于临床CMR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号