首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Detection of coronary plaques using MR coronary vessel wall imaging: Validation of findings with intravascular ultrasound
【24h】

Detection of coronary plaques using MR coronary vessel wall imaging: Validation of findings with intravascular ultrasound

机译:使用MR冠状动脉壁成像检测冠状动脉斑块:血管内超声检查结果的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Compared with X-ray coronary angiography (CAG), magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary vessel wall (MR-CVW) may provide more information about plaque burden and coronary remodelling. We compared MR-CVW with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the standard of reference for coronary vessel wall imaging, with regard to plaque detection and wall thickness measurements. Methods: In this study 17 patients with chest pain, who had been referred for CAG, were included. Patients underwent IVUS and MR-CVW imaging of the right coronary artery (RCA). Subsequently, the coronary vessel wall was analysed for the presence and location of coronary plaques. Results: Fifty-two matching RCA regions of interest were available for comparison. There was good agreement between IVUS and MR-CVW for qualitative assessment of presence of disease, with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 76%. Wall thickness measurements demonstrated a significant difference between mean wall thickness on IVUS and MR-CVW (0.48 vs 1.24mm, P < 0.001), but great heterogeneity between wall thickness measurements, resulting in a low correlation between IVUS and MR-CVW. Conclusions: MR-CVW has high sensitivity for the detection of coronary vessel wall thickening in the RCA compared with IVUS. However, the use of MRI for accurate absolute wall thickness measurements is not supported when a longitudinal acquisition orientation is used. Key Points: ? Both MRI and IVUS can assess coronary vessels ? Both MRI and IVUS can identify coronary vessel wall thickening. ? MRI provides more information about the coronary plaque burden than conventional angiography. ? However, MRI overestimates absolute coronary wall thickness when compared with IVUS.
机译:目的:与X射线冠状动脉造影(CAG)相比,冠状动脉血管壁的磁共振成像(MR-CVW)可能提供有关斑块负荷和冠状动脉重塑的更多信息。在斑块检测和壁厚测量方面,我们将MR-CVW与血管内超声(IVUS)(冠状动脉壁成像的参考标准)进行了比较。方法:本研究包括17例因CAG转诊的胸痛患者。患者接受了IVUS和右冠状动脉(RCA)的MR-CVW成像。随后,分析冠状动脉壁的冠状动脉斑块的存在和位置。结果:52个匹配的RCA感兴趣区域可供比较。 IVUS和MR-CVW在定性评估疾病存在方面达成了很好的协议,敏感性为94%,特异性为76%。壁厚测量结果表明IVUS和MR-CVW的平均壁厚之间存在显着差异(0.48对1.24mm,P <0.001),但是壁厚测量之间存在很大的异质性,导致IVUS和MR-CVW之间的相关性较低。结论:与IVUS相比,MR-CVW对RCA中冠状动脉壁增厚的检测具有较高的灵敏度。但是,当使用纵向采集方向时,不支持将MRI用于精确的绝对壁厚测量。关键点: ? MRI和IVUS都可以评估冠状血管吗? MRI和IVUS均可识别冠状动脉壁增厚。 ?与常规血管造影相比,MRI提供了更多有关冠状动脉斑块负担的信息。 ?但是,与IVUS相比,MRI高估了绝对冠状动脉壁的厚度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号