...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Effectiveness of a multipurpose observation unit: before and after study.
【24h】

Effectiveness of a multipurpose observation unit: before and after study.

机译:多功能观察装置的有效性:研究前后。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of multipurpose observation units has not been assessed in comparative studies. A study was undertaken to analyse the effects of the adoption of clear criteria of admission, clinical pathways and time limits together with the strengthening of clinical supervision and dedicated staff on the performance of a short observation unit (SOU). METHODS: In the period from 1 January to 26 March 2007, the rates of SOU utilisation, length of observation, consumption of resources during observation (diagnostic tests and specialist consultations), rates of hospitalisation and adverse events were measured. Reattendances at the emergency department (ED) within 3 months of discharge were also analysed. Patients admitted to the SOU during the same period in 2006 acted as controls. RESULTS: Compared with 2006, more patients were admitted to the SOU from the ED (8.8% vs 4.5%, p<0.01) where they had spent less time (mean (SD) 13.8 (11.6) h vs 23.0 (13.4) h, p<0.01). Despite the reduction in the length of stay, case mix standardised rates of hospitalisation were not significantly increased (28.9% vs 26.2%). Consultations and radiological investigations were reduced (32.4% vs 40.2%, p<0.05; and 34.1% vs 45.3%, p<0.01, respectively). Adverse events during the observation period or after hospitalisation were exceptionally rare. The short observation of intestinal obstruction, upper gastrointestinal bleeding without endoscopy, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, pneumonia or acute heart failure gave questionable benefits since they had high rates of hospitalisation. During the 3 months after discharge from the SOU, fewer patients returned to the ED (16.3% vs 27.2% for all causes, p<0.01; 9.3% vs 14.4% for related causes, p<0.05) and hospitalisation was necessary in fewer cases (1.7% vs 4.3% for all causes, p<0.05) while re-admissions to the SOU remained unchanged (8.7% vs 8.2%, p = NS). CONCLUSION: Brief observation in the ED draws a clear benefit from proper organisation and the adoption of standardised clinical pathways.
机译:背景:在比较研究中尚未评估多功能观察站的临床疗效。进行了一项研究,以分析采用明确的入院标准,临床路径和时限以及加强临床监督和专职人员对短期观察单位(SOU)的影响。方法:在2007年1月1日至3月26日期间,对SOU使用率,观察时间,观察过程中的资源消耗(诊断测试和专科医生咨询),住院率和不良事件进行了测量。还分析了出院后3个月内急诊室(ED)的出勤情况。在2006年同期入选SOU的患者作为对照。结果:与2006年相比,急诊室接受SOU的患者更多(8.8%vs 4.5%,p <0.01),他们花费的时间更少(平均(SD)13.8(11.6)h vs 23.0(13.4)h, p <0.01)。尽管住院时间有所减少,但病例混合标准住院率并未显着提高(28.9%对26.2%)。咨询和放射检查减少了(分别为32.4%vs 40.2%,p <0.05;和34.1%vs 45.3%,p <0.01)。在观察期或住院后的不良事件极少发生。短时间观察肠梗阻,上消化道出血而不进行内窥镜检查,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,肺炎或急性心力衰竭,因其住院率高,因此值得商question。在从SOU出院后的3个月内,返回急诊科的患者较少(所有原因的发生率分别为16.3%和27.2%,p <0.01;相关原因的发生率分别为9.3%和14.4%,p <0.05),并且较少的病例需要住院(1.7%对比所有原因的4.3%,p <0.05),重新加入SOU的比例保持不变(8.7%对比8.2%,p = NS)。结论:在急诊室进行的简短观察从适当的组织和采用标准化的临床途径中获得了明显的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号