...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Safety and efficiency of triaging low urgent self-referred patients to a general practitioner at an acute care post: An observational study
【24h】

Safety and efficiency of triaging low urgent self-referred patients to a general practitioner at an acute care post: An observational study

机译:一项观察性研究:将低急诊自诊患者转诊至急诊科的全科医生的安全性和效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To assess the safety and efficiency of triaging low urgent self-referred patients at the emergency department (ED) to a general practitioner (GP) based on the Manchester triage system (MTS). Methods All self-referred patients in the evening, night and weekends were included in this prospective observational study. Patients were triaged by an ED nurse according to the MTS and allocated to a GP or the ED according to a predefined care scheme. For patients treated by the GP, assessments were made of safety as measured by hospitalisation and return to the ED within 2 weeks, and efficiency as measured by referral to the ED. Results In 80% of cases allocation of the self-referrals to the ED or GP was according to a predefined scheme. Of the 3129 low urgent self-referred patients triaged to the GP, 2840 (90.8%) were sent home, 202 (6.5%) were directly referred to the ED, 36 (1.2%) were hospitalised. Within a random sample of low urgent patients sent home by the GP (222 of 2840), 8 (3.6%) returned to the ED within 2 weeks. Against the agreed MTS scheme, the ED also directly treated 664 low urgent patients, mainly for extremity problems (n=512). Despite the care agreements, 227 urgent patients were treated by the GP, with a referral rate to the ED of 18.1%, a hospitalisation rate of 4.0% and a 4.5% return rate to the ED within 2 weeks. Conclusions Low urgent self-referrals, with the exception of extremity problems, were shown to be treated efficiently and safely by a GP. A selected group of more urgent patients also seem to be handled adequately by the GP. Triage of low urgent patients with extremity problems and reasons for nurses not following a predefined triage allocation scheme need further elaboration.
机译:目的评估基于曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)的急诊科急诊低自我推荐患者到全科医生(GP)的安全性和效率。方法这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了所有在晚上,晚上和周末自我推荐的患者。 ED护士根据MTS对患者进行了分类,并根据预定义的护理方案分配给GP或ED。对于通过GP进行治疗的患者,通过住院评估并在2周内返回ED进行安全性评估,并通过转诊给ED评估效率。结果在80%的情况下,根据推荐方案将自我推荐人分配给ED或GP。在3129名经GP诊治的低危急诊自诊患者中,有2840名(90.8%)被送回家中,有202名(6.5%)被直接转诊至急诊科,有36名(1.2%)住院。在全科医生送回家中的低危紧急患者的随机样本中(2840中的222),有8名(3.6%)在2周内返回急诊科。与商定的MTS计划相反,急诊部还直接治疗了664名低急症患者,主要针对四肢问题(n = 512)。尽管有护理协议,全科医生治疗了227名紧急患者,在2周内转诊至ED的比率为18.1%,住院率为4.0%,返还ED的比率为4.5%。结论除四肢问题外,低急诊自我推荐服务已被GP有效且安全地治疗。 GP似乎也适当地选择了一组较紧急的患者。患有肢体问题的低危急诊患者的分诊以及护士未遵循预先定义的分诊分配方案的原因需要进一步阐述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号