首页> 外文期刊>European orthopaedics and traumatology >Comparative, prospective, randomized study of the modified minimally invasive technique versus the conventional technique of dynamic hip screw (DHS), fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly
【24h】

Comparative, prospective, randomized study of the modified minimally invasive technique versus the conventional technique of dynamic hip screw (DHS), fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly

机译:改良微创技术与传统动态髋螺钉(DHS)固定术治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折的比较,前瞻性,随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The conventional dynamic hip screw constructs include the potential for delayed, non-union secondary to fracture site devascularization and higher morbidity to the elder population. Minimally invasive surgery is the current buzzword in all fields of surgery. The minimally invasive dynamic hip screw technique, compared to the conventional approach, had better outcome measures as decreasing the operating time, hospital stay, and blood loss while maintaining equal fixation stability.Patients and method: This is a prospective randomized study. Consent was taken from 85 patients suffering from intertrochanteric fractures from June 2010 to December 2012. Forty patients were treated by dynamic hip screw fracture fixation using the modified minimally invasive technique while 45 patients by the conventional technique. Patients having dementia or psychiatric illness or unable to walk before the injury were excluded.Results: There were 54 males and 31 females. The mean age was 65 years old with a range of 63–78 years, 48 on right side and 37 on left side. The mean follow-up period was 12 months with a range from 10 to 18 months. All patients had a complete fracture union with a mean of 4.2 (range 4–6) months. One case had a lag screw cut through the bone 3 weeks postoperatively in the minimally invasive group. The mean operative time of the modified minimally invasive technique was 35 (range 25–50) min. The mean incision length was 3.5 (range 3–5) cm in the modified group and 12 (range 10–15) cm in the conventional group. The mean pain visual analogue scale was 2.5 (range 2–5) in the modified group and 4.5 (range 5–8) in the conventional group. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.8 (range 2–5) days in the modified group and 5.9 (range 3–9) days in the conventional group.Conclusions: The modified minimally invasive dynamic hip screw fixation had less operative time than in previously reported studies. It has better outcome measures, which benefit the patients and reduce the hospital costs.Level of Clinical Evidence: Therapeutic level III
机译:背景:传统的动态髋螺钉构造可能会导致继发于骨折部位脱血管的延迟性,非骨性连接以及对老年人群的更高发病率。在所有手术领域中,微创手术是当前的流行语。与传统方法相比,微创动态髋螺钉技术在减少手术时间,减少住院时间和失血同时保持相同的固定稳定性方面,具有更好的预后指标。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性随机研究。同意书来自2010年6月至2012年12月的85例股骨转子间骨折患者。采用改良的微创技术通过动态髋螺钉骨折固定术治疗40例患者,而常规技术则为45例患者。患痴呆或精神病或受伤前无法行走的患者被排除在外。结果:男性54例,女性31例。平均年龄为65岁,范围在63-78岁之间,右侧48岁,左侧37岁。平均随访期为12个月,范围从10到18个月。所有患者均发生了平均4.2个月(4-6个月)的完全骨折愈合。在微创治疗组中,有1例在术后3周切有一颗拉力螺钉穿过骨头。改良的微创技术的平均手术时间为35分钟(范围25–50)。改良组的平均切口长度为3.5(3-5厘米),常规组为12(10-15厘米)。改良组的平均疼痛视觉模拟评分为2.5(范围2–5),常规组为4.5(范围5–8)。改良组的平均术后住院天数为2.8(范围2–5)天,常规组为5.9(范围3–9)天。结论:改良的微创动力髋螺钉固定术的手术时间比以前报道的要少学习。它具有更好的预后措施,使患者受益并降低了医院费用。临床证据级别:治疗级别III

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号