...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Prehospital trauma management: a national study of paramedic activities.
【24h】

Prehospital trauma management: a national study of paramedic activities.

机译:院前创伤管理:护理人员活动的全国研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of prehospital trauma management remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the processes of care and outcomes of trauma patients treated by paramedics, who are trained in advanced prehospital trauma care, with those treated by ambulance technicians. METHODS: A six year prospective study was conducted of adult trauma patients attended to by the Scottish Ambulance Service and subsequently admitted to hospital. Prehospital times, interventions, triage, and outcomes were compared between patients treated by paramedics and those treated by technicians. RESULTS: Paramedics attended more severely injured patients (16.5% versus 13.9%, p<0.001); they attended a higher proportion of patients with penetrating trauma (6.6% versus 5.7%, p 0.014) and had longer prehospital times. Patients managed by paramedics were more likely to be taken to the intensive care unit, operating theatre or mortuary, (11.2% versus 7.8%, p<0.001) and had higher crude mortality rates (5.3% versus 4.5%, p =0.07). However, no difference in mortality between the two groups was noted when corrected for age, Glasgow coma score and injury severity score. CONCLUSIONS: This large scale national study shows that paramedics show good triage skills and clinical judgement when managing trauma patients. However, the value of the individual interventions they perform could not be ascertained. Further controlled trials are necessary to determine the true benefits of advanced prehospital trauma life support.
机译:目的:院前创伤处理的益处仍有争议。这项研究的目的是将接受过高级院前创伤护理培训的,由护理人员治疗的创伤患者的护理过程和结果与由救护车技术人员治疗的患者进行比较。方法:一项为期六年的前瞻性研究针对由苏格兰救护车服务部护理并随后入院的成人创伤患者进行。在医护人员治疗和技术人员治疗之间,比较了院前时间,干预措施,分类和结局。结果:医护人员救治了较重的患者(16.5%比13.9%,p <0.001);他们参加了更高比例的穿透性创伤患者(6.6%比5.7%,p = 0.014),住院时间更长。由护理人员管理的患者更有可能被送往重症监护病房,手术室或太平间(11.2%对7.8%,p <0.001),粗死亡率更高(5.3%对4.5%,p = 0.07)。但是,校正年龄,格拉斯哥昏迷评分和损伤严重程度评分后,两组之间的死亡率没有差异。结论:这项大规模的全国性研究表明,护理人员在处理创伤患者时显示出良好的分诊技能和临床判断能力。但是,无法确定他们执行的各个干预措施的价值。为了确定高级院前创伤生命支持的真正益处,有必要进行进一步的对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号