【24h】

A novel 'pelvic ring augmentation construct' for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction in tumour surgery

机译:新型腰椎骨盆重建术的“骨盆环增强构造”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim Reconstructing or augmenting the lumbo-pelvic junction after resection ofL5 and part of the sacrumis challenging. Numerous lumbo-pelvic reconstruction methods based on posterior construct and anterior cages have been proposed for cases involving total sacrectomy and lumbar vertebrectomy. These constructs create long lever arms and generate high cantilever forces across the lumbo-sacral junction, resulting in implant failure or breakage. Biomechanical studies have shown that placing implants anterior to lumbo-sacral pivot point provides a more effective moment arm to resist flexion force and improves the ultimate strength of the construct. We present here a novel method to augment a lumbo-pelvic construction using a pelvic ring construct. Methods A 69-year-old lady presented with implant failure of her two previous posterior lumbo-pelvic reconstructions performed by the authors. She initially presented, two and a half years previously with 6 months history of back pain with normal neurological function. MRI scans of her whole spine showed isolated secondaries in the lumbar spine (L4, L5) and sacrum (S1). An abdominal CT scan revealed a primary tumour in her right kidney. Briefly, the first surgery involved a single-stage removal of posterior elements of L4 and L5 and posterior stabilisation from L2 to pelvis, anterior resection of L4 and L5 and partially S1 with implantation of an expandable Synex II cage. The cage was replaced with an anterior rod construct from L2 and L3 to a trans-sacral screw a week later as it had dislodged. The second revision, 9 months later, involved removal of two posterior broken rods which were replaced and converted into a modified four-rod construct. While monitoring her progress, it was subsequently noted that the trans-sacral rod had broken. Therefore, it was decided to augment her lumbo-pelvic construct to prevent eventual catastrophic posterior construct failure. From a posterior approach, contoured rods were passed bilaterally along the inner table of the pelvis under the iliacus muscle up to the anterior border of the pelvis. Using T-connectors, the rods were connected to the posterior lumbo-pelvic construct. Thereafter, two anterior supra-acetabular pelvic screws were connected to a subcutaneously placed rod matched to the shape of the anterior abdominal wall. The pelvic ring construct was completed on connecting this rod with T-connectors to the free ends of the contoured iliac rods. Results and conclusion There were no intra-operative complications. At the end of 12 months, she was mobilising with a frame, with no radiological evidence of failure of the construct. However, she died due to disease progression at the end of 15 months. Experience from one clinical case shows that such a construct is feasible and adds a technical option to the difficult reconstruction of lumbo-pelvic junction after tumour surgery.
机译:目的在切除L5和部分s骨后,重建或增强腰-骨盆连接处。对于全total骨切除和腰椎椎体切除术,已经提出了多种基于后部构造和前笼的腰骨盆重建方法。这些结构产生长的杠杆臂,并在腰s交界处产生高的悬臂力,从而导致植入物失效或破裂。生物力学研究表明,将植入物放置在腰pivot枢轴点的前面可以提供更有效的力矩臂来抵抗屈曲力并提高结构的极限强度。我们在这里提出一种新颖的方法来增加使用骨盆环构造的腰骨盆构造。方法一位69岁的女士曾因作者进行的两次前腰后骨盆重建手术而植入失败。她最初出现在两年半以前,具有6个月的背痛史,神经功能正常。整个脊柱的MRI扫描显示,腰椎(L4,L5)和ac骨(S1)中的孤立的继发神经。腹部CT扫描显示她的右肾有原发肿瘤。简而言之,第一项手术包括单阶段切除L4和L5的后部元素,以及从L2到骨盆的后部稳定,L4和L5的前部切除以及部分S1植入可扩展的Synex II笼。一周后,笼子被从L2和L3的前杆构造替换为to骨螺钉。 9个月后的第二次修订涉及拆除两个后部折断的棒,这些棒被替换并转换为改良的四棒构造。在监测她的进展时,随后注意到the骨杆已断裂。因此,决定增加她的腰-骨盆结构以防止最终的灾难性后结构失败。从后入路开始,使轮廓化的棒沿着along骨内侧下方的骨盆内表双向通过,直至骨盆的前边界。使用T型连接器,将杆连接到腰后骨盆结构。此后,将两个前髋臼上骨盆螺钉连接至与前腹壁形状匹配的皮下放置的杆。骨盆环构造完成后,将带有T型连接器的该杆连接到轮廓骨杆的自由端。结果与结论无术中并发症。在12个月结束时,她正在用框架进行动员,没有放射学证据表明该构造失败。但是,她由于疾病进展在15个月末死亡。从一个临床病例的经验表明,这种构造是可行的,并且为肿瘤手术后腰腰骨盆连接处的困难重建增加了技术选择。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号