首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test.
【24h】

Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test.

机译:10秒钟台阶测试的有效性:前瞻性研究将其与10秒钟抓握和释放测试以及30米步行测试进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM) is one of the common neurological disorders seen in the geriatric population. The 10-s Grip and Release ("G and R") Test and the 30-m Walking ("Walking") Test are widely known as quantifiable physical assessments for the severity of cervical myelopathy. We developed the 10-s Step ("Step") Test as another easily performable quantifiable measure for this. However, it is not clear if the Step test can adequately reveal the severity of myelopathy like the other established tests, given its simple method. The purpose of this study was to verify the practical effectiveness of this Step Test as a quantifiable parameter of CCM in comparison with the other two established tests. 168 consecutive patients with CCM were selected. Only 101 patients having >12-month postoperative follow-up were included. All were treated with cervical expansive laminoplasty. The three above mentioned quantitative tests and two assessment questionnaires (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] Score, and lower-limb-function section of the Japanese Orthopedic Association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire [JOACMEQ-L]) for CCM were prospectively administered, and the results of the three tests were evaluated using linear regression models to determine which quantitative test best reflected the results of the JOA score and JOACMEQ-L. Each quantitative test was carried out twice, just before and 1 year after surgery. The intraobserver reproducibility of the 10-s Step Test was found to be as high as that of the other tests both before and after surgery. Linear regression analyses showed that the results of the Step Test correlated with JOA scores to the same degree as the Walking Test results did, and to a greater degree than the G and R Test results did. Moreover, the results of the Step Test showed a significant degree of correlation with JOACMEQ-L. In view of these findings, our conclusion was that the easily performed Step Test is an useful test for assessing the severity of cervical myelopathy, especially for the lower limb dysfunction secondary to CCM.
机译:颈椎压缩性脊髓病(CCM)是老年人群中常见的神经系统疾病之一。 10-s握力和释放(“ G和R”)测试和30-m步行(“行走”)测试是众所周知的宫颈脊髓病严重程度的可量化物理评估方法。我们开发了10秒步骤(“步骤”)测试,以此作为另一种易于执行的量化措施。然而,尚不清楚阶梯试验是否可以像其他已建立的试验一样充分揭示脊髓病的严重程度,因为其方法简单。这项研究的目的是与其他两个既定测试相比,验证该步骤测试作为CCM的可量化参数的实际有效性。选择了168例连续的CCM患者。只有101例术后随访≥12个月的患者被纳入研究。所有患者均接受宫颈扩张椎板成形术。前三项针对CCM的定量测试和两份评估问卷(日本骨科协会[JOA]评分,以及日本骨科协会颈椎病评估问卷[JOACMEQ-L]的下肢功能部分)进行了前瞻性管理,结果使用线性回归模型评估了这三个测试中的哪个,以确定哪个定量测试最能反映JOA得分和JOACMEQ-L的结果。每个定量测试在手术前和手术后一年进行两次。发现10步步骤测试的观察者内部可重复性与手术前后的其他测试一样高。线性回归分析表明,阶跃测试的结果与JOA得分的相关程度与步行测试的结果相同,并且比G和R测试的结果更高。此外,步骤测试的结果显示出与JOACMEQ-L的显着相关程度。鉴于这些发现,我们的结论是,容易进行的逐步试验是评估颈椎病严重程度,尤其是继发于CCM的下肢功能障碍的有用试验。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号