首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Influence of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with postoperative PFMT on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Influence of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with postoperative PFMT on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial

机译:术前和术后骨盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)与术后PFMT相比对前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的影响:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The efficacy of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for urinary incontinence (UI) after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is still unclear. Objective To determine whether patients with additional preoperative PFMT regain urinary continence earlier than patients with only postoperative PFMT after ORP and RARP. Design, setting, and participants A randomized controlled trial enrolled 180 men who planned to undergo ORP/RARP. Intervention The experimental group (E, n = 91) started PFMT 3 wk before surgery and continued after surgery. The control group (C, n = 89) started PFMT after catheter removal. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary end point was time to continence. Patients measured urine loss daily (24-h pad test) until total continence (three consecutive days of 0 g of urine loss) was achieved. Secondary end points were 1-h pad test, visual analog scale (VAS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (King's Health Questionnaire [KHQ]). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression with correction for two strata (age and type of surgery) compared time and continence. The Fisher exact test was applied for the 1-h pad test and VAS; the Mann-Whitney U test was applied for IPSS and KHQ. Results and limitations Patients with additional preoperative PFMT had no shorter duration of postoperative UI compared with patients with only postoperative PFMT (p = 0.878). Median time to continence was 30 and 31 d, and median amount of first-day incontinence was 108 g and 124 g for groups E and C, respectively. Cox regression did not indicate a significant difference between groups E and C (p = 0.773; hazard ratio: 1.047 [0.768-1.425]). The 1-h pad test, VAS, and IPSS were comparable between both groups. However, "incontinence impact" (KHQ) was in favor of group E at 3 mo and 6 mo after surgery. Conclusions Three preoperative sessions of PFMT did not improve postoperative duration of incontinence. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register No. NTR 1953.
机译:背景技术术前盆腔底部肌肉训练(PFMT)对开放性前列腺癌根治术(ORP)和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RARP)后尿失禁(UI)的疗效尚不清楚。目的确定是否有额外术前PFMT的患者在ORP和RARP后是否比仅术后PFMT的患者更早恢复尿失禁。设计,设置和参与者一项随机对照试验招募了180名计划进行ORP / RARP的男性。干预实验组(E,n = 91)在手术前3周开始PFMT,手术后继续。对照组(C,n = 89)在拔除导管后开始PFMT。结果测量和统计分析主要终点是大便时间。患者每天测量尿液流失(24小时尿垫试验),直到达到完全失禁(连续3天尿液流失量为0 g)为止。次要终点是1-h垫测验,视觉模拟量表(VAS),国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和生活质量(国王健康问卷[KHQ])。 Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归分析并校正了两个层次(年龄和手术类型),比较了时间和节制。 Fisher精确测试用于1-h垫测试和VAS; Mann-Whitney U检验用于IPSS和KHQ。结果与局限性与仅进行术后PFMT的患者相比,进行其他术前PFMT的患者的UI持续时间没有缩短(p = 0.878)。失禁的中位时间为30和31 d,E组和C组的第一天失禁的中位数分别为108 g和124 g。 Cox回归未表明E组和C组之间存在显着差异(p = 0.773;危险比:1.047 [0.768-1.425])。两组的1-h垫测试,VAS和IPSS相当。然而,术后3个月和6个月时,“失禁影响”(KHQ)有利于E组。结论PFMT的术前三节不能改善术后尿失禁的持续时间。试用注册荷兰试用注册号NTR 1953。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号