首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Poor Performance Status
【24h】

Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Poor Performance Status

机译:表现不良的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者中醋酸阿比特龙的治疗效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although abiraterone acetate ( abiraterone) has proven efficacy in two randomised phase 3 trials in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer ( mCRPC), patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ( ECOG) performance status ( PS) 2 were either excluded or under- represented in these trials. Objective: To compare outcomes in ECOG PS 0- 1 and 2 in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Design, setting, and participants: Cancer registries from three Canadian centres were used to retrospectively identify mCRPC patients ( postdocetaxel and docetaxel- nai " ve) treated with abiraterone. ECOG PS, clinicopathologic characteristics, prostate- specific antigen ( PSA) response, and survival data were collected. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan- Meier method and compared using the log- rank test. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to examine the effect of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival ( OS) and time to PSA progression. Results and limitations: A total of 519 patients were identified; 61% ( n = 318) and 39% ( n = 201) were ECOG PS 0- 1 and 2, respectively. ECOG PS 0- 1 patients were significantly more likely than PS 2 patients to achieve a PSA decline 50% from baseline ( 45% vs 32%; p = 0.003, Fisher exact test) and had significantly longer median time to PSA progression ( 5.2 mo vs 4.1 mo; p = 0.023), median treatment duration ( 7.4 mo vs 4.5 mo; p < 0.001), and median OS ( 20.0 mo vs 9.1 mo; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was a significant factor for OS ( p < 0.001), time to PSA progression ( p = 0.043), and PSA decline ( p = 0.002). Potential limitations include the retrospective study design and subjective nature of ECOG PS classification. Conclusions: ECOG PS 2 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone have inferior outcomes compared with ECOG 0- 1 patients, especially in regard to OS. These data indicate that early initiation of abiraterone prior to a decline in PS may be warranted. Patient summary: We found that advanced prostate cancer patients who have worse performance status ( PS) derive less benefit from abiraterone, indicating that earlier treatment before PS declines could improve outcomes. Crown Copyright # 2014 Published by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:尽管醋酸阿比特龙(abiraterone)在两项针对转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)的随机3期试验中已证明是有效的,但排除了东部合作肿瘤小组(ECOG)表现状态(PS)2的患者-在这些试验中代表。目的:比较接受阿比特龙治疗的mCRPC患者的ECOG PS 0-1和2的转归。设计,设置和参与者:来自加拿大三个中心的癌症登记处用于回顾性鉴定接受阿比特龙治疗的mCRPC患者(多西他赛和多西他赛),ECOG PS,临床病理特征,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应和生存率收集结果数据并进行统计学分析:采用Kaplan-Meier方法评估生存结果,并采用对数秩检验进行比较;使用Cox比例风险模型检查临床病理特征对总体生存(OS)和时间的影响结果与局限性:共鉴定出519例患者; ECOG PS 0-1和ECOG PS 0-1分别为61%(n = 318)和39%(n = 201),ECOG PS 0-1的患者显着比PS 2患者更有可能实现PSA与基线相比下降50%(45%比32%; p = 0.003,Fisher精确检验),并且PSA进展的中位时间明显更长(5.2 mo vs. 4.1个月; p = 0.023),中位治疗持续时间(7.4 mo vs 4.5 mo; p <0.001)和中位OS(20.0 mo vs 9.1 mo; p <0.001)。在多变量分析中,ECOG PS是OS(p <0.001),PSA进展时间(p = 0.043)和PSA下降(p = 0.002)的重要因素。潜在的局限性包括回顾性研究设计和ECOG PS分类的主观性质。结论:阿比特龙治疗的ECOG PS 2 mCRPC患者的结局较ECOG 0-1患者差,尤其是在OS方面。这些数据表明,在PS下降之前应尽早开始阿比特龙治疗。患者摘要:我们发现,表现状态较差(PS)的晚期前列腺癌患者从阿比特龙中获得的获益较少,这表明在PS下降之前进行早期治疗可以改善预后。 Crown版权#2014由Elsevier B. V.代表欧洲泌尿外科协会出版。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号