首页> 外文期刊>European urology >'A Robot Saved My Life': Is It a Myth?
【24h】

'A Robot Saved My Life': Is It a Myth?

机译:“机器人拯救了我的生命”:这是神话吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) have been reported in several papers, although it has been only about a decade since the method was introduced. No long-term follow-up data for RARP are available for comparison with open radical prostatectomy (ORP).Sweden is a country with a high incidence and an extremely high mortality rate for prostate cancer (PCa) [1]. One of the first European centers at which RARP was introduced is at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. In the current issue of European Urology, Sooriakumaran and collaborators at this center present medium-term oncologic outcomes of RARP with a biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) of 84.8% at a median follow-up of 6.3 yr, and they concluded that there were "satisfactory" outcomes for this procedure [2].
机译:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的成果已在几篇论文中进行了报道,尽管自从该方法被引入以来只有大约十年的时间。目前尚无RARP的长期随访数据可与开放式前列腺癌根治术(ORP)进行比较。瑞典是前列腺癌(PCa)发病率高且死亡率极高的国家[1]。最早引入RARP的欧洲中心之一是瑞典斯德哥尔摩的Karolinska大学医院。在本期《欧洲泌尿外科》中,Sooriakumaran和该中心的合作者介绍了RARP的中期肿瘤学结局,其中位随访时间为6.3年,生化无复发生存率(BRFS)为84.8%。在该过程中的结果“令人满意” [2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号