首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Update on Training Models in Endourology: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature between January 1980 and April 2008.
【24h】

Update on Training Models in Endourology: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature between January 1980 and April 2008.

机译:呼吸内科培训模式的最新进展:1980年1月至2008年4月之间文献的定性系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Interest in the use of simulators in urological skills training is on the increase. To ensure effective implementation of training models, an overview of the nature and validity of the available models is of the essence. OBJECTIVE: To obtain an overview of training models and their validity by performing a qualitative systematic review of the literature. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies were identified through searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science between January 1980 and April 2008 using two search strategies: "urology and (training or simulat* or model)" and combinations of these terms with prostate, described one or more training models, and/or (2) examined the validity of training models. Studies in undergraduate education and of training models for physical examination were excluded. Validation studies were scored according to Kirkpatrick and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Forty-five articles (out of the initial list of 4753 retrieved articles, 0.9%) were included, describing 30 types of training models and 54 validation studies. The largest number of models has been described for ureterorenoscopy (nine types). Only three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), receiving a 1b OCEBM level of evidence score, were found. Studies investigating the impact of simulator training on performance in patients (criterion B validity) were scarce. The number of participants in experimental studies ranged from 7 to 136. CONCLUSIONS: Due to growing interest in training models in urology, it is increasingly urgent to determine which of these models are most valuable for postgraduate training. Because the validation studies published so far are few in number, have low evidence levels, and are composed of only a few RCTs, it is important that more randomised controlled validation studies including larger numbers of participants are performed.
机译:背景:在泌尿外科技能培训中使用模拟器的兴趣正在增加。为了确保有效实施培训模型,必须对可用模型的性质和有效性进行概述。目的:通过对文献进行定性的系统综述,以获取训练模型及其有效性的概述。证据获取:研究是通过1980年1月至2008年4月之间对PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science的搜索而确定的,其中使用了两种搜索策略:“泌尿外科和(训练或模拟*或模型)”以及这些术语与前列腺的结合,描述了一个或多个训练模型,和/或(2)检查了训练模型的有效性。排除了本科教育和身体检查训练模型的研究。根据Kirkpatrick和牛津循证医学中心(OCEBM)的证据水平对验证研究进行评分。证据综合:纳入四十五篇文章(在最初检索到的4753篇文章中,占0.9%),描述了30种训练模型和54项验证研究。已经描述了用于输尿管镜检查的最多模型(九种类型)。仅发现三项获得1b OCEBM证据评分的随机对照试验(RCT)。缺乏关于模拟器训练对患者表现(标准B有效性)影响的研究。实验研究的参与者范围为7到136。结论:由于对泌尿外科培训模型的兴趣日益浓厚,因此迫切需要确定其中哪些模型对研究生培训最有价值。由于迄今为止发表的验证研究数量少,证据水平低并且仅由少数RCT组成,因此进行包括更多参与者的更多随机对照验证研究非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号