首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Re: Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Robot-assisted versus retropubic
【24h】

Re: Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Robot-assisted versus retropubic

机译:回复:决定前列腺癌根治术后功能结局的因素:机器人辅助与耻骨后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Expert's summary:In this nonrandomized study, the authors prospectively compared the functional outcomes of 763 patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). All the procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2010. The robotic approach offered faster recovery of continence after the initial 132 cases, and faster recovery of potency even when considering the initial cases. Furthermore, a younger age, a longer membranous urethral length on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and a higher serum testosterone level were independent predictors of better functional results. The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was slightly higher after the robotic approach, but this difference was not statistically significant. The authors concluded that patients had better functional outcomes after RARP than after RRP.
机译:专家总结:在这项非随机研究中,作者前瞻性地比较了763例接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)或耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)的患者的功能结局。所有过程均由一名外科医生在2007年至2010年之间执行。机器人方法可在最初的132例病例后更快地恢复大小便,即使考虑初始病例也能更快地恢复药效。此外,更年轻的年龄,术前磁共振成像上更长的膜尿道长度和更高的血清睾丸激素水平是更好的功能结果的独立预测因素。机器人手术后,手术切缘阳性率(PSM)略高,但这一差异在统计学上不显着。作者得出的结论是,RARP后的患者的功能转归比RRP后的患者更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号