首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
【24h】

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

机译:根治性前列腺切除术后决定功能预后的因素:机器人辅助与耻骨后。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Early studies reported comparative results of functional outcomes between robot-assisted (RARP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). However, well-controlled single-surgeon prospective studies comparing the outcomes are rare. OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcomes after RARP and RRP performed by a single surgeon, and to identify factors predictive of early return of continence and potency. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 763 consecutive patients undergoing RP between 2007 and 2010 were prospectively included and serially followed postoperatively for comparative analysis. INTERVENTION: RARP was performed in 528 patients, and 235 underwent RRP. MEASUREMENTS: Continence was defined as being completely pad free. Potency was defined as having erection sufficient for intercourse with or without a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Continence and potency recovery were checked serially by interview and questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards method analyses was performed to determine predictive factors for early recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After the initial 132 cases, patients who underwent RARP demonstrated faster recovery of urinary continence compared to RRP patients. Potency recovery was more rapid in the RARP group at all evaluation time points, beginning from the initial cases. In multivariate analysis, younger age and longer preoperative membranous urethral length seen by prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated statistical significance as independent prognostic factors for continence recovery; younger age, surgical method (RARP vs RRP), and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery. The limitations of the present study were that it was nonrandomized and used interview to evaluate potency recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients after RARP demonstrated superior functional recovery. Moreover, membranous urethral length on preoperative MRI and patient age were factors independently predictive of continence recovery, while patient age and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery.
机译:背景:早期研究报道了机器人辅助(RARP)和耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)之间的功能结局比较结果。但是,比较结果的对照良好的单手术前瞻性研究很少。目的:比较一名外科医生在进行RARP和RRP治疗后的功能结局,并确定可预测早期尿失禁和尿毒症恢复的因素。设计,地点和参加者:前瞻性纳入2007年至2010年间共763例接受RP的连续患者,并对患者进行连续随访以进行比较分析。干预:528例患者接受了RARP,其中235例接受了RRP。测量:节制被定义为完全无垫。效力定义为在有或没有5型磷酸二酯酶的情况下具有足以进行性交的勃起。术后1、3、6、9、12、18和24个月,通过访谈和问卷调查连续检查大便和效能。进行了Cox比例风险方法分析,以确定早期恢复的预测因素。结果与局限性:最初的132例患者中,接受RARP的患者比RRP的患者表现出更快的尿失禁恢复。从最初的病例开始,在所有评估时间点,RARP组的效能恢复都更快。在多变量分析中,前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)观察到年龄较小,术前膜尿道长度更长,这是独立的预后因素,对大便恢复有统计学意义。年龄较小,手术方法(RARP与RRP)和术前血清睾丸激素升高是恢复效能的独立预后因素。本研究的局限性在于它是非随机的,并通过访谈来评估效能的恢复。结论:RARP后的患者表现出优越的功能恢复。此外,术前MRI上的膜性尿道长度和患者年龄是预测尿失禁恢复的独立因素,而患者年龄和术前血清睾丸激素水平升高是恢复体力的独立预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号