首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Residual tumor size and IGCCCG risk classification predict additional vascular procedures in patients with germ cell tumors and residual tumor resection: A multicenter analysis of the German testicular cancer study group
【24h】

Residual tumor size and IGCCCG risk classification predict additional vascular procedures in patients with germ cell tumors and residual tumor resection: A multicenter analysis of the German testicular cancer study group

机译:残余肿瘤大小和IGCCCG风险分类可预测生殖细胞肿瘤和残余肿瘤切除患者的额外血管手术:德国睾丸癌研究组的多中心分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Residual tumor resection (RTR) after chemotherapy in patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT) is an important part of the multimodal treatment. To provide a complete resection of residual tumor, additional surgical procedures are sometimes necessary. In particular, additional vascular interventions are high-risk procedures that require multidisciplinary planning and adequate resources to optimize outcome. Objectives: The aim was to identify parameters that predict additional vascular procedures during RTR in GCT patients. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis was performed in 402 GCT patients who underwent 414 RTRs in 9 German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) centers. Overall, 339 of 414 RTRs were evaluable with complete perioperative data sets. Measurements: The RTR database was queried for additional vascular procedures (inferior vena cava [IVC] interventions, aortic prosthesis) and correlated to International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification and residual tumor volume. Results and limitations: In 40 RTRs, major vascular procedures (23 IVC resections with or without prosthesis, 11 partial IVC resections, and 6 aortic prostheses) were performed. In univariate analysis, the necessity of IVC intervention was significantly correlated with IGCCCG (14.1% intermediate/poor vs 4.8% good; p = 0.0047) and residual tumor size (3.7% size <5 cm vs 17.9% size ≥5 cm; p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, IVC intervention was significantly associated with residual tumor size ≥5 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 4.61; p = 0.0007). In a predictive model combining residual tumor size and IGCCCG classification, every fifth patient (20.4%) with a residual tumor size ≥5 cm and intermediate or poor prognosis needed an IVC intervention during RTR. The need for an aortic prosthesis showed no correlation to either IGCCCG (p = 0.1811) or tumor size (p = 0.0651). Conclusions: The necessity for IVC intervention during RTR is correlated to residual tumor size and initial IGCCCG classification. Patients with high-volume residual tumors and intermediate or poor risk features must initially be identified as high-risk patients for vascular procedures and therefore should be referred to specialized surgical centers with the ad hoc possibility of vascular interventions.
机译:背景:晚期生殖细胞肿瘤(GCT)患者化疗后的残留肿瘤切除术(RTR)是多模式治疗的重要组成部分。为了提供残余肿瘤的完整切除,有时需要额外的手术程序。特别是,额外的血管介入是高风险的程序,需要多学科的计划和充足的资源来优化结果。目的:目的是确定可预测GCT患者RTR期间额外血管程序的参数。设计,背景和参与者:在德国9个睾丸癌研究组(GTCSG)中心对402例接受414 RTR的GCT患者进行了回顾性分析。总体而言,在完整的围手术期数据集中可以评估414个RTR中的339个。测量:在RTR数据库中查询其他血管程序(下腔静脉[IVC]干预,主动脉假体),并将其与国际生殖细胞癌合作组织(IGCCCG)的分类和残余肿瘤体积相关联。结果与局限性:在40例RTR中,进行了主要的血管手术(23例有或没有假体的IVC切除,11例IVC局部切除和6例主动脉假体)。在单因素分析中,IVC干预的必要性与IGCCCG(14.1%中/差vs. 4.8%良好; p = 0.0047)和残余肿瘤大小(3.7%大小<5 cm vs 17.9%大小≥5cm; p < 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,IVC干预与残余肿瘤大小≥5cm显着相关(优势比[OR]:4.61; p = 0.0007)。在结合残余肿瘤大小和IGCCCG分类的预测模型中,每五分之二(20.4%)残余肿瘤大小≥5cm且预后中等或不良的患者在RTR期间需要进行IVC干预。对主动脉假体的需求与IGCCCG(p = 0.1811)或肿瘤大小(p = 0.0651)无关。结论:RTR期间IVC干预的必要性与残余肿瘤大小和初始IGCCCG分类有关。首先必须将具有大量残留肿瘤,中度或不良风险特征的患者识别为血管手术的高危患者,因此应转介至专门的外科中心进行血管介入治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号