首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Predictive and Prognostic Models in Radical Prostatectomy Candidates: A Critical Analysis of the Literature
【24h】

Predictive and Prognostic Models in Radical Prostatectomy Candidates: A Critical Analysis of the Literature

机译:前列腺癌根治术候选者的预测和预后模型:对文献的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Numerous predictive and prognostic tools have recently been developed for risk stratification of prostate cancer (PCa) patients who are candidates for or have been treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).Objective: To critically review the currently available predictive and prognostic tools for RP patients and to describe the criteria that should be applied in selecting the most accurate and appropriate tool for a given clinical scenario.Evidence acquisition: A review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Relevant reports published between 1996 and January 2010 identified using the keywords prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, predictive tools, predictive models, and nomograms were critically reviewed and summarised.Evidence synthesis: We identified 16 predictive and 22 prognostic validated tools that address a variety of end points related to RP. The majority of tools are prediction models, while a few consist of risk-stratification schemes. Regardless of their format, the tools can be distinguished as preoperative or postoperative. Preoperative tools focus on either predicting pathologic tumour characteristics or assessing the probability of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. Postoperative tools focus on cancer control outcomes (BCR, metastatic progression, PCa-specific mortality [PCSM], overall mortality). Finally, a novel category of tools focuses on functional outcomes. Prediction tools have shown better performance in outcome prediction than the opinions of expert clinicians. The use of these tools in clinical decision-making provides more accurate and highly reproducible estimates of the outcome of interest. Efforts are still needed to improve the available tools' accuracy and to provide more evidence to further justify their routine use in clinical practice. In addition, prediction tools should be externally validated in independent cohorts before they are applied to different patient popu...
机译:背景:最近开发了许多针对前列腺癌(PCa)患者的分层策略,这些患者是前列腺癌根治术(RP)的候选者或接受过前列腺癌根治术(RP)的患者。目的:严格审查目前可用的RP预测和预后工具病人,并描述在给定的临床情况下选择最准确和最合适的工具应采用的标准。证据获取:使用Medline,Scopus和Web of Science数据库对文献进行回顾。严格审查并总结了1996年至2010年1月间使用关键词前列腺癌,根治性前列腺切除术,预测工具,预测模型和列线图所确定的相关报告。证据综合:我们确定了16种预测方法和22种经过验证的预后验证工具,这些工具可解决各种问题与RP相关的要点。大多数工具是预测模型,而少数工具则由风险分层计划组成。不论其格式如何,这些工具都可以区分为术前还是术后。术前工具侧重于预测RP后的病理肿瘤特征或评估生化复发(BCR)的可能性。术后工具侧重于癌症控制结果(BCR,转移进展,PCa特异性死亡率[PCSM],总死亡率)。最后,一类新颖的工具侧重于功能结果。与专家临床医生的意见相比,预测工具在结果预测中显示出更好的性能。在临床决策中使用这些工具可以对目标结果进行更准确和高度可重复的估计。仍然需要努力提高可用工具的准确性,并提供更多证据以进一步证明其在临床实践中的常规使用。此外,在将预测工具应用于不同的患者群体之前,应对它们进行独立的外部验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号