【24h】

Outcome after homograft redo operation in aortic position.

机译:在主动脉位置进行同种异体重做手术后的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since 1992, homografts have been implanted in our institution. After initial sub-coronary implantation of the homograft, our preferred technique for aortic-valve replacement with homografts became root replacement, which poses a surgical challenge whenever redo procedures are necessary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome after homograft redo surgery, based on prospective data from the biggest patient cohort in Germany for this procedure.Between May 1992 and August 2009, 363 adult patients underwent aortic-valve replacement with homografts in our cardiac surgery department. Homograft replacement was indicated in 90 of these 363 patients due to degenerative or infective conditions, and these were analysed.In these 73 male and 17 female patients (mean age at redo operation 62.0 years), homograft explantation was necessary due to infection (n = 14) or degeneration (stenosis n = 19, regurgitation > II° n = 57). Mean time between homograft implantation and redo operation was 8.4 ± 3.6 years (range 0.0-15.5 years). Redo valve replacement through the aorta/homograft was done in 86 cases (valve into homograft wall = 80, total replacement of the homograft = 6) and trans-apical homograft replacement with an Edwards Sapien? Trans-catheter valve in four. Thirteen additional procedures were performed: bypass surgery (n = 1), mitral-valve repair (n = 6), replacement of the ascending aorta (n = 5) and tricuspid-valve repair (n = 1). Thirty-day mortality was 8.9% (n = 8, all of these patients presented with a homograft infection; five patients had a homograft reinfection). Survival rates after 1 and 5 years were 86.0% and 77.4%, respectively.The risk for a redo procedure after aortic-valve replacement with a homograft seems to be acceptable when compared with other prostheses. Mortality was, however, elevated in patients with a homograft infection. Trans-apical procedures are safe and feasible and might be our preferred technique for the future. Valve infections still remain a contraindication for trans- apical procedures.
机译:自1992年以来,同种异体移植物已植入我们的机构。在同种异体的首次冠状动脉次次植入之后,我们用同种异体移植替代主动脉瓣的首选技术成为了根部替代,这在需要重做手术时提出了手术挑战。本研究的目的是根据德国最大的患者队列的前瞻性数据评估同种异体移植手术后的结果.1992年5月至2009年8月之间,本研究中有363名成年患者接受了同种异体主动脉瓣置换术心脏外科。在363例患者中有90例由于退行性或感染性原因而进行了同种异体移植,并进行了分析。在这73例男性和17例女性患者中(重做手术的平均年龄为62.0岁),由于感染需要进行同种异体移植(n = 14)或变性(狭窄n = 19,反流> II°n = 57)。同种异体植入和重做手术之间的平均时间为8.4±3.6年(范围0.0-15.5年)。通过主动脉/同种异体移植进行重做瓣膜置换术的病例为86例(瓣膜进入同种异体壁= 80,同种异体的总置换量= 6),并经Edwards Sapien进行经心尖的同种异体置换跨导管瓣四分。进行了十三项附加操作:搭桥手术(n = 1),二尖瓣修复(n = 6),置换升主动脉(n = 5)和三尖瓣修复(n = 1)。 30天死亡率为8.9%(n = 8,所有这些患者均发生了同种异体移植感染; 5例患者进行了同种异体再感染)。 1年和5年后的存活率分别为86.0%和77.4%。与其他假体相比,用同种异体移植主动脉瓣后进行重做手术的风险似乎可以接受。然而,同种异体感染患者的死亡率升高。经心尖手术是安全可行的,可能会成为我们未来的首选技术。瓣膜感染仍是经心尖手术的禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号