首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >A randomised phase II study of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) or cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in advanced gastric cancer.
【24h】

A randomised phase II study of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) or cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in advanced gastric cancer.

机译:联合化疗联合表柔比星,顺铂和卡培他滨(ECX)或顺铂和卡培他滨(CX)治疗晚期胃癌的II期随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Both cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) and epirubicin plus CX (ECX) have clearly demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically confirmed, measurable AGC were randomised to receive CX (cisplatin 75mg/m(2) iv on day 1 and capecitabine 1000mg/m(2) bid po on days 1-14) or ECX (epirubicin 50mg/m(2) plus CX) every 3weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 91 registered patients, 45 patients were treated with CX and 44 with ECX. A total of 241 CX (median, 6; range, 1-12) and 201 ECX (median, 5; range, 1-11) cycles were delivered. Treatment duration was similar for both arms (4.4 for CX versus 4.2months for ECX). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the CX and ECX arms (80% versus 78%, respectively; P=0.516). However, none in the CX and 12% in the ECX arm discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between CX and ECX with respect to the response rate (38% versus 37%, respectively) and PFS (6.4 versus 6.5months). CONCLUSION: Both CX and ECX appear to be active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC, and the safety profiles are acceptable. Given the comparable efficacy results, CX could be a reasonable standard chemotherapy for untreated AGC patients.
机译:背景:顺铂/卡培他滨(CX)和表柔比星加CX(ECX)均已明确证明可抵抗晚期胃癌(AGC)。方法:未经化学治疗的,经组织学证实可测量的AGC的患者随机接受CX(第1天静脉滴注顺铂75mg / m(2),第1-14天口服卡培他滨1000mg / m(2)口服)或ECX(阿霉素50mg) / m(2)加上CX),每3周一次。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:在91例登记患者中,有45例接受了CX治疗,有44例接受了ECX治疗。共交付了241个CX(中位数,6;范围1-12)和201 ECX(中位数,5;范围1-11)周期。两组的治疗时间相似(CX为4.4个月,ECX为4.2个月)。 CX和ECX组之间总体3级或4级毒性的发生没有相关差异(分别为80%和78%; P = 0.516)。但是,由于毒性,CX中没有一个中断,而ECX组中有12%中断了治疗。就缓解率(分别为38%对37%)和PFS(6.4对6.5个月)而言,CX和ECX的疗效没有显着差异。结论:CX和ECX似乎都可以作为AGC的一线化疗药物,并且安全性可以接受。鉴于可比的疗效结果,对于未经治疗的AGC患者,CX可能是合理的标准化疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号