首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials
【24h】

Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials

机译:西妥昔单抗作为KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌一线治疗的化学疗法:CRYSTAL和OPUS随机临床试验的汇总分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials demonstrated that adding cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) significantly improved treatment outcome compared with chemotherapy alone. The objective of this pooled analysis was to further investigate these findings in patients with KRAS wild-type tumours using extended survival data and following an enhancement in the ascertainment rate of KRAS and BRAF tumour mutation status from these studies. Methods: Pooled individual patient data from each study were analysed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and best overall response rate (ORR) in patients evaluable for KRAS and BRAF mutation status. Treatment arms were compared according to mutation status using log-rank and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Results: In 845 patients with KRAS wild-type tumours adding cetuximab to chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; p = 0.0062), PFS (HR 0.66; p < 0.001) and ORR (odds ratio 2.16; p < 0.0001). BRAF mutations were detected in 70/800 evaluable tumours. No significant differences were found in outcome between the treatment groups in these patients. Prognosis was worse in each treatment arm for patients with BRAF tumour mutations compared with those with BRAF wild-type tumours. Conclusion: Analysis of pooled data from the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies confirms the consistency of the benefit obtained across all efficacy end-points from adding cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. BRAF mutation does not appear to be a predictive biomarker in this setting, but is a marker of poor prognosis.
机译:背景:CRYSTAL和OPUS随机临床试验表明,与单独化疗相比,在KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的一线化疗中加入西妥昔单抗可显着改善治疗效果。该汇总分析的目的是使用延长的生存数据并继这些研究确定的KRAS和BRAF肿瘤突变状态的确定率之后,进一步调查KRAS野生型肿瘤患者的这些发现。方法:对每项研究的汇总患者个人数据进行分析,以评估可评估KRAS和BRAF突变状态的患者的总体生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS)和最佳总体缓解率(ORR)。使用对数秩和Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel检验根据突变状态比较治疗组。结果:在845例KRAS野生型肿瘤患者中,在化疗中加入西妥昔单抗可显着改善OS(危险比[HR] 0.81; p = 0.0062),PFS(HR 0.66; p <0.001)和ORR(比值比2.16) ; p <0.0001)。在70/800个可评估的肿瘤中检测到BRAF突变。这些患者在治疗组之间的结局方面未发现显着差异。与BRAF野生型肿瘤患者相比,BRAF肿瘤突变患者的每个治疗组的预后都更差。结论:对来自CRYSTAL和OPUS研究的汇总数据的分析证实,在KRAS野生型mCRC患者中,在第一线化疗中加入西妥昔单抗可在所有功效终点中获得益处。在这种情况下,BRAF突变似乎不是预测性的生物标志物,但预后不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号