...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer: official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) >Frequency and severity of skin reactions in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, the usefulness of two assessment instruments - A pilot study
【24h】

Frequency and severity of skin reactions in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, the usefulness of two assessment instruments - A pilot study

机译:接受辅助放疗的乳腺癌患者皮肤反应的频率和严重程度,两种评估工具的有效性-一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acute radiation skin reactions (ARSR) are a major problem in curative radiotherapy (RT). A number of studies have failed to show a positive effect of different skin care products to reduce or prevent ARSR. The aims for this study were to describe frequency and severity of ARSR in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant RT and to test the suitability in clinical use of two assessment instruments. A majority (93%) of the 93 patients with breast cancer included in this study developed ARSR, most of them mild reactions. Low scores for pain and itching (VAS) were reported. ARSR were assessed using the modified version of RTOG/EORTC acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria and the World Health Organisation (WHO) grading system for acute and subacute toxicity by two independent observers after the completion of RT. The percentages of discordant assessment between the two observers were 21% for the WHO scale and 32% for the RTOG/EORTC. Severe ARSR, classified as grades 2-4 on both instruments resulted in good agreement between the two instruments. However, the assessments using RTOG/EORTC resulted in an almost 10% higher proportion of severe ARSR. Comparisons of health related quality of life and sleep revealed no statistically significant differences between patients with mild or severe ARSR assessed by the RTOG/EORTC scale with the exception of cognitive functioning. The use of assessment instruments to describe treatment-related symptoms is complicated and clinical experience is not always enough. More research is needed to validate these instruments to guarantee sound and precise assessments.
机译:急性放射皮肤反应(ARSR)是根治性放射治疗(RT)的主要问题。许多研究未能显示出不同的护肤品对减少或预防ARSR的积极作用。这项研究的目的是描述接受辅助放疗的乳腺癌患者发生ARSR的频率和严重程度,并测试两种评估工具在临床上的适用性。本研究纳入的93例乳腺癌患者中,大多数(93%)患上了ARSR,其中大多数为轻度反应。疼痛和瘙痒(VAS)评分较低。在完成RT后,由两名独立的观察员使用RTOG / EORTC急性放射发病评分标准和世界卫生组织(WHO)急性和亚急性毒性分级系统对ARSR进行了评估。两名观察员之间不一致评估的百分比在WHO量表中为21%,在RTOG / EORTC中为32%。两种仪器均被归类为2-4级的严重ARSR导致两种仪器之间的一致性良好。但是,使用RTOG / EORTC进行的评估导致严重ARSR的比例提高了近10%。与健康相关的生活质量和睡眠质量的比较显示,除认知功能外,通过RTOG / EORTC量表评估的轻度或重度ARSR患者之间无统计学差异。使用评估工具描述与治疗相关的症状很复杂,并且临床经验并不总是足够的。需要更多的研究来验证这些工具,以确保进行正确而准确的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号