首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Current medical intervention alone is now the best solution for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. letter to the editors of Journal of Vascular Surgery and the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery regarding trans-atlantic debate no. 1.
【24h】

Current medical intervention alone is now the best solution for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. letter to the editors of Journal of Vascular Surgery and the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery regarding trans-atlantic debate no. 1.

机译:现在,仅当前的医学干预措施就可以解决无症状的颈动脉狭窄。致《血管外科杂志》和《欧洲血管与血管内外科杂志》编辑的信,内容涉及跨大西洋辩论。 1。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current medical intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.1 Dr Schneider's case against this conclusion is fatally flawed because it is based on an outdated, over-reliance on borderline significant results from historical randomised carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trials ('level 1 evidence') and underestimation of the counter-evidence.1'2 There have been significant falls in average annual rates of ipsilateral and any territory stroke (+/- TIA) with medical intervention alone since the early 1980s, rates falling below those of patients who received medical intervention and CEA in randomised trials.
机译:现在,仅是目前的医学干预措施就可以最好地预防与无症状性颈动脉狭窄相关的中风。1Schneider博士反对这一结论的案例存在致命缺陷,因为它是基于过时的,过分依赖历史随机颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的重要结果试验(“ 1级证据”)和对证据的低估。1'2自1980年代初以来,仅通过医疗干预,同侧和任何区域性卒中的年平均发生率(+/- TIA)已大大下降,低于随机试验中接受医学干预和CEA的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号