首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Modern treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated endografting and open repair--a systematic review.
【24h】

Modern treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated endografting and open repair--a systematic review.

机译:开窗式内移植和开放式修补现代治疗近侧腹主动脉瘤-系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Advances in endovascular technology have led to the introduction of fenestrated stents to treat juxtarenal aneurysms (JRAs), previously deemed unsuitable for standard endovascular repair (EVR). This article reviews the outcomes of fenestrated technology and makes a comparison with open repair. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. RESULTS: No randomised studies were identified. 8 cohort studies reporting 368 f-EVR cases and 12 cohorts reporting 1164 open repairs of JRAs were identified. Analysis of outcome measures found the f-EVR and open cohorts to be homogeneous. Combining studies identified an increased 30-day mortality after open repair when compared to f-EVR (Relative risk (RR) 1.03, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.04, p=.02), 2% increased absolute mortality. No difference was identified in postoperative permanent dialysis dependence (RR 1.00, CI 0.99-1.01, p=1). Transient renal failure was more common following open repair (RR 1.06, CI 1.01-1.12, p=.03). Early re-interventions were less common following open repair (RR 0.87, CI 0.83-0.91, p=.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Selective f-EVR appears to have reduced peri-operative mortality compared with traditional open surgery, yet selectivity within the study groups and lack of a rigorous classification prohibit more robust comparison. Promising short-term results confirm a role for f-EVR in management of complex abdominal aneurysms.
机译:引言:血管内技术的进步导致引入开窗支架来治疗近来的肾上腺动脉瘤(JRA),以前被认为不适合标准血管内修复(EVR)。本文回顾了开窗技术的成果,并与开放式维修进行了比较。方法:对文献进行系统的回顾。结果:未发现随机研究。确定了8个队列研究,报告368例f-EVR病例和12个队列报告了1164例JRAs的开放性修复。结果测量的分析发现f-EVR和开放队列是同质的。组合研究发现,与f-EVR相比,开放式修复后30天死亡率增加(相对风险(RR)1.03,95%可信区间(CI)1.01-1.04,p = .02),绝对死亡率增加2%。术后永久性透析依赖性无差异(RR 1.00,CI 0.99-1.01,p = 1)。开放性修复后,短暂性肾衰竭更为常见(RR 1.06,CI 1.01-1.12,p = .03)。开放修复后早期再干预较少见(RR 0.87,CI 0.83-0.91,p = .0001)。结论:与传统的开放手术相比,选择性f-EVR似乎降低了围手术期死亡率,但是研究组的选择性和缺乏严格的分类禁止进行更可靠的比较。近期有希望的结果证实了f-EVR在复杂腹部动脉瘤管理中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号