首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Commentary on 'Comparison of three contemporary risk scores for mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair'
【24h】

Commentary on 'Comparison of three contemporary risk scores for mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair'

机译:关于“选择性三期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复后死亡率的三个当代风险评分的比较”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the study by Grant et al., three contemporary risk scores are externally validated using a cohort of aneurysm repairs from a database held in the North West of England. The authors state that all three demonstrate good calibration and discrimination for predicting in-hospital mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, although in a cohort with only 32 deaths.As the authors say in their opening statement, there are no widely used scoring systems in clinical practice to guide whether a patient should, or should not, undergo intervention for an AAA. There are a number of reasons for this and all should continue to be used with caution.
机译:在格兰特(Grant)等人的研究中,使用英格兰西北部数据库中的一组动脉瘤修复术从外部验证了三个当代风险评分。作者指出,尽管在只有32例死亡的队列研究中,这三者在择期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复后对院内死亡率的预测均显示出良好的校准和辨别力。临床实践中的评分系统,以指导患者是否应该接受AAA干预。造成这种情况的原因很多,应继续谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号