...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery >Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV): abolition of sapheno-femoral reflux with preservation of the great saphenous vein.
【24h】

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV): abolition of sapheno-femoral reflux with preservation of the great saphenous vein.

机译:前副大隐静脉(AAGSV)的腔内激光消融(EVLA):取消隐股回流并保留大隐静脉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: During surgery for sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) and anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV) reflux, many surgeons also strip the great saphenous vein (GSV). This study assesses the short-term efficacy (abolition of reflux on Duplex ultrasound) of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the AAGSV with preservation of a competent GSV in the treatment of varicose veins occurring due to isolated AAGSV incompetence. METHOD: Thirty-three patients (21 women and 12 men) undergoing AAGSV EVLA alone (group A) and 33 age/sex-matched controls undergoing GSV EVLA (Group B) were studied. Comparisons included ultrasound assessment of SFJ competence, successful axial vein ablation, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Symptom Severity Scores (AVVSS) and a visual analogue patient-satisfaction scale. RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up, EVLA had successfully abolished the target vein reflux (AAGSV: median length 19 cm (inter-quartile range, IQR: 14-24 cm) vs. GSV: 32 cm (IQR 24-42 cm)) and had restored SFJ competence in all patients. Twenty of the 33 patients (61%) in group A and 14 of the 33 (42%) in group B (p=0.218) required post-ablation sclerotherapy at 6 weeks post-procedure for residual varicosities. The AVVSS at 12 months follow-up had improved from the pre-treatment scores in both the groups (group A: median score 4.1 (IQR 2.1-5.2) vs. 11.6 (IQR: 6.9-15.1) p<0.001; group B: median score 3.3 (IQR 1.1-4.5) vs. 14.5 (IQR 7.6-20.2), p<0.001), with no significant difference between the groups. Patient-satisfaction scores were similar (group A: 84% and group B: 90%). Previous intervention in group A included GSV EVLA (n=3) or stripping (n=9). Thus, the GSV was preserved in 21 patients. The AVVSS also improved in this subgroup (4.4 (2.0-5.4) vs. 11.4 (6.0-14.1), p<0.001) and SFJ/GSV competence was found to be restored at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: AAGSV EVLA abolishes SFJ reflux, improves symptom scores and is, therefore, suitable for treating varicose veins associated with AAGSV reflux.
机译:目的:在进行大腿股隐交界处(SFJ)和大隐静脉前附件(AAGSV)返流的手术期间,许多外科医生还剥离了大隐静脉(GSV)。这项研究评估了AAGSV的腔内激光消融(EVLA)的短期疗效(取消双工超声),同时保留了有效的GSV用于治疗因孤立的AAGSV功能不全而引起的静脉曲张。方法:研究33例接受AAGSV EVLA的患者(21名女性和12名男性)(A组)和33例年龄/性别匹配的接受GSV EVLA的对照组(B组)。比较包括对SFJ功能的超声评估,成功的轴向静脉消融,阿伯丁静脉曲张症状严重程度评分(AVVSS)和视觉模拟患者满意度量表。结果:在1年的随访中,EVLA成功取消了目标静脉反流(AAGSV:中位长度19 cm(四分位间距,IQR:14-24 cm)与GSV:32 cm(IQR 24-42)厘米)),并恢复了所有患者的SFJ能力。 A组的33名患者中有20名(61%),B组的33名患者中有14名(42%)(p = 0.218)在术后6周需进行消融硬化治疗以治疗残余静脉曲张。两组在12个月随访时的AVVSS均较治疗前评分有所改善(A组:中位评分4.1(IQR 2.1-5.2)与11.6(IQR:6.9-15.1)p <0.001; B组:中位数得分3.3(IQR 1.1-4.5)与14.5(IQR 7.6-20.2),p <0.001),两组之间无显着差异。患者满意度得分相似(A组:84%,B组:90%)。 A组的先前干预措施包括GSV EVLA(n = 3)或剥离(n = 9)。因此,GSV被保留在21例患者中。该亚组的AVVSS也有所改善(4.4(2.0-5.4)与11.4(6.0-14.1),p <0.001),并且在1年的随访中发现SFJ / GSV能力得到恢复。结论:AAGSV EVLA消除了SFJ反流,改善了症状评分,因此适合治疗与AAGSV反流相关的静脉曲张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号