首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Discharge from the accident and emergency department after smoke inhalation: influence of clinical factors and emergency investigations.
【24h】

Discharge from the accident and emergency department after smoke inhalation: influence of clinical factors and emergency investigations.

机译:吸入烟后从急症室排出:临床因素和紧急调查的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES:: Smoke inhalation has become the principal cause of death in burns patients. There are few guidelines for the management of smoke inhalation in the accident and emergency department. The aim was to identify what factors influence immediate management. METHODS:: A retrospective case note review using data from three west of Scotland accident and emergency departments in 1999. Computerized record systems were used to identify suitable patients. RESULTS:: Of 120 patients, 63 patients had incomplete data and were excluded. A total of 57 patients were classified into one of five categories: no burns, normal vital signs and examination (group 1, n=23); no burns, abnormal vital signs or examination (group 2, n=26); minor burns (<15% total body surface area) with or without abnormal vital signs or examination (group 3, n=5); major burns (>15% total body surface area) (group 4, n=2); in cardiac arrest on arrival (group 5, n=1). In groups 1 and 3, the result of two investigations significantly influenced management. In group 2, arterial blood gases and carboxyhaemoglobin levels were abnormal in 25% of cases, but only on one occasion did it influence an admission decision. CONCLUSION:: Arterial blood gases, chest radiography and carboxyhaemoglobin estimation rarely influence immediate management. Patients presenting with normal vital signs and examination and short smoke exposure may be safe to discharge from the accident and emergency department without further investigation.
机译:目的:吸入烟雾已成为烧伤患者死亡的主要原因。事故和急诊部门对烟气吸入的管理指南很少。目的是确定哪些因素影响立即管理。方法:使用1999年来自苏格兰西部急救部门三个部门的数据进行回顾性病例笔记审查。计算机记录系统用于识别合适的患者。结果:在120例患者中,有63例数据不完整并被排除在外。共有57例患者被分为五类之一:无烧伤,正常生命体征和检查(第1组,n = 23);无烧伤,异常生命体征或检查(第2组,n = 26);轻度烧伤(<15%的全身表面积),有或没有异常生命体征或检查(第3组,n = 5);严重烧伤(> 15%的全身表面积)(第4组,n = 2);到达心脏骤停时(第5组,n = 1)。在第1组和第3组中,两次调查的结果显着影响了管理。在第2组中,有25%的病例的动脉血气和羧基血红蛋白水平异常,但仅一次影响入院决定。结论:动脉血气,胸部X光片和碳氧血红蛋白的估计很少影响即时治疗。表现出正常生命体征和检查且烟气短的患者可以安全地从事故和急诊科出院,而无需进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号