首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Comparison of rocuronium and succinylcholine on postintubation sedative and analgesic dosing in the emergency department
【24h】

Comparison of rocuronium and succinylcholine on postintubation sedative and analgesic dosing in the emergency department

机译:罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱在急诊科插管后镇静和镇痛剂量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Rocuronium and succinylcholine are both commonly used neuromuscular blockers for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to determine if patients who receive rocuronium are more likely to receive lower doses of postintubation sedatives and analgesics compared with patients who receive succinylcholine. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out in a tertiary, academic ED. Consecutive adult patients, who were intubated using etomidate for induction of sedation, were included. Patients were categorized on the basis of whether they received (a) rocuronium or (b) succinylcholine for paralysis. The dosing of postintubation sedative and analgesic infusions were compared 30 min after initiation between the two groups. Results: A total of 254 patients were included in the final analysis (rocuronium=127 and succinylcholine=127). In the overall cohort, 90.2% (n=229) of patients were administered a sedative postintubation in the ED. Most of these patients were initiated on propofol infusions. The mean propofol infusion rate at 30 min was 30±23 mcg/kg/min in the rocuronium group and 42±24 mcg/kg/min in the succinylcholine group (P=0.002). A total of 42.5% of patients (n=108) received an analgesic infusion (all patients received fentanyl). The mean fentanyl infusion rate at 30 min was 0.65±0.55 and 0.86±0.49 mcg/kg/h in the rocuronium and succinylcholine groups, respectively (P=0.041). Conclusion: Patients who receive rocuronium are more likely to receive lower doses of sedative and analgesic infusions after intubation. This may place them at risk of being awake under paralysis.
机译:目的:罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱都是急诊科(ED)中快速序列插管常用的神经肌肉阻滞剂。这项研究的目的是确定接受罗库溴铵治疗的患者与接受琥珀酰胆碱治疗的患者相比,是否更可能接受较低剂量的插管后镇静剂和镇痛药。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在大专院校的ED中进行。包括连续连续的成年患者,他们使用依托咪酯插管以诱导镇静作用。根据患者是否接受(a)罗库溴铵或(b)琥珀酰胆碱麻痹将患者分类。两组开始后30分钟比较插管后镇静剂和镇痛剂的剂量。结果:最终分析共纳入254例患者(罗库溴铵= 127,琥珀酰胆碱= 127)。在整个队列中,有90.2%(n = 229)的患者在ED中接受了镇静后插管。这些患者大多数是从异丙酚输注开始的。罗库溴铵组在30分钟时的平均异丙酚输注速率为30±23 mcg / kg / min,琥珀胆碱组为42±24 mcg / kg / min(P = 0.002)。总共42.5%的患者(n = 108)接受了镇痛输液(所有患者均接受芬太尼)。罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱组在30分钟时的平均芬太尼输注速率分别为0.65±0.55和0.86±0.49 mcg / kg / h(P = 0.041)。结论:接受罗库溴铵的患者在插管后更有可能接受较低剂量的镇静剂和镇痛剂输注。这可能会使他们处于瘫痪状态下醒着的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号