首页> 外文期刊>European journal of emergency medicine: Official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine >Is routine electrolyte testing necessary for diabetic patients who present to the emergency department with moderate hyperglycemia?
【24h】

Is routine electrolyte testing necessary for diabetic patients who present to the emergency department with moderate hyperglycemia?

机译:就诊于急诊中度高血糖的糖尿病患者是否需要常规电解质检测?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: No consensus standard is established for the workup of diabetic patients with moderate hyperglycemia [fingerstick glucose of 11.00-33.00 mmol/l (200-600 mg/dl)]. We measured the incidence of serious electrolyte abnormalities in patients with moderate hyperglycemia and attempted to identify a subset of these patients who can safely forego routine electrolyte testing. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in two affiliated emergency departments. Inclusion criteria: Moderate hyperglycemia. Exclusion criteria: new onset diabetes or renal failure. The composite outcome was defined as an abnormal potassium K >5.00 or <3.50 mmol/l or diabetic ketoacidosis. Univariate analyses were performed using t-test and Fisher's exact test (alpha=0.05, two-tails). Logistic regression models were generated to identify variables that could predict the composite outcome. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-nine adults were enrolled (294 type II, 38% men). Mean age was 59+/-15 (20-97 years) years. The incidence of the composite outcome was 22% (95% confidence interval, 17.8-26.0%, n=86). The univariate analysis identified potassium-altering medications and insulin use as risk factors for the composite outcome. Logistic regression analysis identified potassium-altering medications as an increased risk (relative risk: 1.64, 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.37) and use of oral hypoglycemics as a decreased risk (relative risk: 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90) of the composite outcome. Cross-validation of the model demonstrated poor sensitivity (76%) and even worse accuracy (51%). CONCLUSION: We failed to identify any subgroup of patients with moderate hyperglycemia who can be safely excluded from routine electrolyte testing. We recommend routine electrolyte testing for all moderate hyperglycemia patients in the emergency department.
机译:目的:尚无针对中度高血糖[手指指葡萄糖为11.00-33.00 mmol / l(200-600 mg / dl)]的糖尿病患者进行检查的共识标准。我们测量了中度高血糖患者严重电解质异常的发生率,并试图确定这些患者中可以安全地放弃常规电解质检测的一部分。方法:在两个附属急诊科进行前瞻性队列研究。纳入标准:中度高血糖。排除标准:新发糖尿病或肾衰竭。综合结果定义为钾钾异常> 5.00或<3.50 mmol / l或糖尿病酮症酸中毒。使用t检验和Fisher精确检验(α= 0.05,两尾)进行单变量分析。生成逻辑回归模型以识别可以预测综合结果的变量。结果:招募了399名成人(294型II型,38%的男性)。平均年龄为59 +/- 15(20-97岁)岁。综合结局的发生率为22%(95%置信区间,17.8-26.0%,n = 86)。单因素分析确定了改变钾的药物和胰岛素的使用是综合结局的危险因素。 Logistic回归分析确定了改变钾的药物风险增加(相对风险:1.64,95%置信区间,1.14-2.37),使用口服降糖药降低了风险(相对风险:0.62,95%置信区间,0.43-0.90 )的综合结果。模型的交叉验证显示出较差的灵敏度(76%)和更差的准确性(51%)。结论:我们未能鉴定出可以安全地排除在常规电解质测试之外的任何中度高血糖患者亚组。我们建议急诊科对所有中度高血糖患者进行常规电解质测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号