...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of medical research. >Diagnostic value of chest radiography, computed tomography and tumour markers in the differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions.
【24h】

Diagnostic value of chest radiography, computed tomography and tumour markers in the differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions.

机译:胸部X光片,计算机断层扫描和肿瘤标志物对良性孤立性肺部病变的鉴别诊断价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic value of the imaging modalities (chest radiography, spiral computed tomography (SCT) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)) and the tumour markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin marker (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)) in the differentiation of malignant (MSPLs) from benign solitary pulmonary lesions (BSPLs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Solitary pulmonary lesions (SPLs) were examined, evaluated and then completely removed by surgery in 104 consecutive patients (MSPLs n = 81, BSPLs n = 23). Chest radiography was performed with frontal and lateral views, SCT was carried out with a slice thickness of 8 mm and HRCT with a slice thickness of 1 mm and a 12-cm field of view. For the tumour marker analysis, serum concentrations were determined 1-3 days prior to surgery by ELISA for CEA and CYFRA 21-1 and by IRMA for NSE using commercially available assay kits. The cut-off values were set at 3 ng/ml (for non-smokers) and 5 ng/ml (for smokers) for CEA, at 3.3 ng/ml for CYFRA 21-1 and at 12.5 ng/ml for NSE. RESULTS: Using any one of the characteristics with a significance level of P <0.01, the identification of MSPLs using chest radiography showed a sensitivity of 64.2% and a specificity of 82.6%, using SCT a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 60.9% and using HRCT a sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 56.5%. For the identification of MSPLs using CEA a sensitivity of 27.2% and a specificity of 87.0% (accuracy of 40.4%) was observed. Using CYFRA 21-1 a sensitivity of 19.8% and a specificity of 100.0% (accuracy of 37.5%) and using NSE a sensitivity of 13.6% and a specificity of 100. 0% (accuracy of 32.7%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Using chest radiography, SCT and HRCT, a precise morphological assessment of the periphery of the pulmonary lesion and the adjacent visceral pleura is necessary to distinguish MSPLs from BSPLs. Tumour markers used alone or in combination with the imaging methods brought no additional benefits, in terms of sensitivity and accuracy, over the diagnostic imaging methods alone. However, the tumour markers exhibited a far superior specificity (100% for CYFRA 21-1 and NSE) compared with the imaging methods.
机译:背景:这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估成像方式(胸部X线摄影,螺旋计算机断层扫描(SCT)和高分辨率计算机断层摄影(HRCT))和肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原(CEA),细胞角蛋白)的诊断价值。标记(CYFRA 21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE))在良性孤立性肺部病变(BSPL)分化为恶性肿瘤(MSPL)中发挥作用。病人和方法:检查,评估孤立性肺部病变(SPL),然后通过手术对104例连续患者进行完全切除(MSPLs = 81,BSPLs = 23)。进行胸部X光片的正面和侧面观察,SCT的切片厚度为8毫米,HRCT的切片厚度为1毫米,视野为12厘米。对于肿瘤标志物分析,在术前1-3天通过CEA和CYFRA 21-1的ELISA和IRMA对于NSE的ELISA方法,使用市售测定试剂盒确定血清浓度。 CEA的临界值设置为3 ng / ml(非吸烟者)和5 ng / ml(吸烟者),CYFRA 21-1的临界值设置为3.3 ng / ml,NSE的临界值设置为12.5 ng / ml。结果:利用显着性水平P <0.01的任何一项特征,胸部X射线照相术鉴定MSPL的敏感性为64.2%,特异性为82.6%,SCT的敏感性为88.9%,特异性为60.9%使用HRCT的敏感性为91.4%,特异性为56.5%。使用CEA鉴定MSPL的灵敏度为27.2%,特异性为87.0%(准确性为40.4%)。使用CYFRA 21-1,灵敏度为19.8%,特异性为100.0%(准确度为37.5%),使用NSE,灵敏度为13.6%,特异性为100. 0%(准确度为32.7%)。结论:使用胸部放射线照相术,SCT和HRCT,需要对肺部病变和邻近的内脏胸膜周围进行精确的形态学评估,以区分MSPL和BSPL。与单独使用诊断成像方法相比,单独使用或与成像方法结合使用的肿瘤标志物在灵敏度和准确性方面均未带来任何其他好处。但是,与成像方法相比,肿瘤标志物显示出非常优越的特异性(CYFRA 21-1和NSE的特异性为100%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号