首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Genetics: An International Journal Devoted to Research in the Inheritance of Behavior in Animals and Man >Genotyping of three candidate genes after whole-genome preamplification of DNA collected from buccal cells.
【24h】

Genotyping of three candidate genes after whole-genome preamplification of DNA collected from buccal cells.

机译:从颊细胞收集的全基因组预扩增后,对三个候选基因进行基因分型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The amount of genomic DNA obtained from buccal cell methods may be suboptimal for large-scale genetics projects, because the quantity of DNA may be insufficient for the number of analyses proposed. Primer extension preamplification (PEP) methods that can amplify the entire genome 100-fold or more, offer a potential solution to this problem. We compared PEP buccal DNA with genomic buccal DNA from 315 individuals from 97 families of the Colorado Longitudinal Twin Study for three loci: the dopamine transporter, dopamine D4 receptor, and serotonin transporter. A total of 1890 genomic and 1890 PEP alleles were assessed, and 1670 comparisons (88%) agreed after a single determination. Fifty-three individuals had one or more failed initial polymerase chain reactions (PCR), with 81 failed PCRs in total, accounting for 162 missing allele calls. The failed PCRs were repeated once, and 146 of the missing allele calls were recovered. Comparisons between genomic and PEP DNA allele calls showed 37 individuals had oneor more discrepancies, for a total of 52 inconsistencies. Of these, the initial PEP result was found to be correct in 18 cases, the initial genomic result was found to be correct in 25 cases, and 9 could not be resolved. Overall, rates of true calls, missing data, and genotyping errors for genomic and PEP DNA samples were nearly identical: of the 1890 genotypes assessed, true calls were found in 1845 genomic and 1840 PEP samples, missing genotypes in 18 genomic and 16 PEP samples, and incorrect assignments in 18 genomic and 25 PEP samples. These results suggest that routine whole-genome preamplification of genomic DNA is an appropriate method for providing DNA to genotype these loci.
机译:从颊细胞法获得的基因组DNA的数量对于大规模遗传学项目可能不是最佳选择,因为DNA的数量可能不足以进行建议的分析。可以将整个基因组扩增100倍或更多倍的引物延伸预扩增(PEP)方法,为解决该问题提供了可能。我们比较了来自科罗拉多州纵向双胞胎研究的97个科的315个个体的PEP颊侧DNA与基因组颊侧DNA的三个位点:多巴胺转运蛋白,多巴胺D4受体和血清素转运蛋白。总共评估了1890个基因组和1890个PEP等位基因,单次测定后同意进行1670个比较(88%)。 53个个体的一个或多个初始聚合酶链反应(PCR)失败,共有81个PCR失败,导致162个等位基因缺失。重复失败的PCR一次,并回收了146个缺失的等位基因。基因组和PEP DNA等位基因检出之间的比较显示,有37个个体有一个或多个差异,总共52个不一致。其中,最初的PEP结果在18例中是正确的,最初的基因组结果在25例中被发现是正确的,而9个无法解决。总体而言,基因组和PEP DNA样品的真实检出率,缺失数据和基因型错误率几乎相同:在评估的1890个基因型中,在1845个基因组和1840个PEP样品中发现了真实检出率,在18个基因组和16个PEP样品中缺失了基因型。 ,以及18个基因组样本和25个PEP样本中的错误分配。这些结果表明,基因组DNA的常规全基因组预扩增是提供DNA以对这些基因座进行基因分型的合适方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号