首页> 外文期刊>European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging >Guidance for accurate and consistent tissue Doppler velocitymeasurement: Comparison of echocardiographicmethods using a simple vendor-independent method for local validation
【24h】

Guidance for accurate and consistent tissue Doppler velocitymeasurement: Comparison of echocardiographicmethods using a simple vendor-independent method for local validation

机译:准确和一致的组织多普勒速度测量指南:使用简单的独立于厂商的方法进行局部验证的超声心动图方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Variability has been described between different echo machines and different modalities when measuring tissue velocities. We assessed the consistency of tissue velocitymeasurements across different modalities and different manufacturers in an in vitro model and in patients. Furthermore, we present freely available software tools to repeat these evaluations. Methods and results We constructed a simple setup to generate reproducible motion and used it to compare velocities measured using three echocardiographic modalities: M-mode, speckle tracking, and tissue Doppler, with a straightforward, non-ultrasound, optical gold standard. In the clinical phase, 25 patients underwent M-mode, speckle tracking, and tissue Doppler measurements of s′, e′, and a′ velocities. In vitro, the M-mode and speckle tracking velocities agreed with optical assessment. Of the three possible tissue Doppler measurement conventions (outer, middle, and inner edge) only the middle agreed with optical assessment (discrepancy 20.20 (95% CI 20.44 to 0.03) cm/s, P = 0.11, outer ±5.19 (4.65 to 5.73) cm/s, P < 0.0001, inner 26.26 (26.87 to 25.65) cm/s, P < 0.0001). A similar pattern occurred across all four studied manufacturers. M-mode was therefore chosen as the in vivo gold standard. Clinical measurements of s′ velocities by speckle tracking and the middle line of the tissue Doppler showed concordance with M-mode, while the outer line overestimated significantly (±1.27(0.96 to 1.59) cm/s, P < 0.0001) and the inner line underestimated (21.82 (22.11 to 21.52) cm/s, P < 0.0001). Conclusions Echocardiographic velocity measurements can be more consistent than previously suspected. The statistically modal velocity, found at the centre of the spectral pulsed wave tissue Doppler envelope, most closely represents true tissue velocity. This article includes downloadable, vendor-independent software enabling calibration of echocardiographic machines using a simple, inexpensive in vitro setup.
机译:背景技术已经描述了在测量组织速度时不同回波机器和不同模态之间的差异。我们评估了体外模型和患者中不同模式和不同制造商的组织速度测量的一致性。此外,我们提供免费的软件工具来重复这些评估。方法和结果我们构建了一个简单的装置来产生可再现的运动,并使用它来比较使用三种超声心动图模式测量的速度:M模式,斑点跟踪和组织多普勒仪,并具有直接的非超声光学金标准。在临床阶段,对25位患者进行了M模式,斑点跟踪和组织多普勒测量s',e'和a'速度的测量。在体外,M-模式和散斑跟踪速度与光学评估一致。在三种可能的组织多普勒测量惯例(外部,中间和内部边缘)中,只有中间与光学评估一致(相差20.20(95%CI 20.44至0.03)cm / s,P = 0.11,外部±5.19(4.65至5.73) )cm / s,P <0.0001,内部26.26(26.87至25.65)cm / s,P <0.0001)。在所有四个研究过的制造商中也发生了类似的情况。因此,选择了M模式作为体内金标准。通过斑点跟踪和组织多普勒中线对s速度的临床测量显示与M模式一致,而外线明显高估了(±1.27(0.96至1.59)cm / s,P <0.0001)被低估(21.82(22.11至21.52)cm / s,P <0.0001)。结论超声心动图速度测量结果可能比以前怀疑的更为一致。在频谱脉冲波组织多普勒包络中心发现的统计模态速度最能代表真实的组织速度。本文包括可下载的,与供应商无关的软件,可使用简单,廉价的体外设置对超声心动图仪进行校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号