...
首页> 外文期刊>European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging >Assessment of left ventricular systolic function by deformation imaging derived from speckle tracking: A comparison between 2D and 3D echo modalities
【24h】

Assessment of left ventricular systolic function by deformation imaging derived from speckle tracking: A comparison between 2D and 3D echo modalities

机译:通过斑点追踪得到的变形成像评估左心室收缩功能:2D和3D回波模态之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AimsDeformation imaging is undergoing continuous development with the emergence of new technologies allowing the evaluation of the different components of strain simultaneously in three dimensions. Assessment of all global strain parameters in 2D and 3D modes and comparison with LVEF have been the focus of our study.Methods and resultsOut of 166 patients, 147 were evaluated with the use of both 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). Global strain parameters including longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), radial (GRS) and area strain (AS), as well as left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were examined. Analysis of strain with 3D STE was faster than with 2D STE (7 ± 2 vs. 24 ± 4 min, P < 0.05). GLS values were similar between 2D and 3D modes (-14 ± 4 vs. -13 ± 3, NS), while slight differences were observed for GCS (-24 ± 7 vs. -27 ± 7, P < 0.05) and GRS (27 ± 9 vs. 24 ± 9, P < 0.05). All 2D and 3D strain parameters showed good accuracy in the identification of 2D-LVEF <55% with AS demonstrating superiority over GCS and GRS but not GLS.ConclusionThree-dimensional STE allows accurate and faster analysis of deformation when compared with 2D STE and might represent a viable alternative in the evaluation of global LV function.
机译:Aims随着新技术的出现,变形成像正在不断发展,可以同时在三个维度上评估应变的不同组成部分。在2D和3D模式下评估所有全局应变参数并与LVEF进行比较一直是我们的研究重点。方法和结果在166例患者中,有147例同时使用了2D和3D斑点跟踪超声心动图(STE)进行了评估。检查了总体应变参数,包括纵向(GLS),圆周(GCS),径向(GRS)和区域应变(AS)以及左心室容积和射血分数。使用3D STE进行应变分析要比使用2D STE进行分析更快(7±2 vs. 24±4 min,P <0.05)。在2D和3D模式下,GLS值相似(-14±4 vs. -13±3,NS),而GCS(-24±7 vs -27±7,P <0.05)和GRS略有差异( 27±9 vs. 24±9,P <0.05)。所有2D和3D应变参数在AS识别2D-LVEF <55%时均显示出良好的准确性,证明优于GCS和GRS但不优于GLS。结论与2D STE相比,三维STE可以准确,快速地分析变形,并且可能代表评估整体左室功能的可行选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号