...
首页> 外文期刊>European Food and Feed Law Review >Restriction of use for health claims in regard to water: interpretation in conformity with the EU law; otherwise advertising ban violates the EU law.
【24h】

Restriction of use for health claims in regard to water: interpretation in conformity with the EU law; otherwise advertising ban violates the EU law.

机译:关于水的健康声明的使用限制:符合欧盟法律的解释;否则,广告禁令违反了欧盟法律。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012, the health claims that water contributes to the maintenance of normal physical and cognitive functions, and also to the maintenance of normal regulation of the body's temperature, have been admitted. As a condition/restriction of use, this Regulation however establishes that these two claims "may be used only on water complying with Directives 2009/54/EC and/or 98/83/EC". It is not clear from this wording, if it means that these water health claims may only be used for drinking water and natural mineral water as a final product; or if this means that these claims may also be made for other foodstuffs, including non-alcoholic beverages, as long as they contain, in a significant amount, drinking water or natural mineral water as an ingredient/compound. The author is assuming that the first, narrow interpretation, would result in an advertising ban not consistent with the principle of proportionality and with fundamental rights of the economic operators (freedom of expression, freedom to pursue a professional activity and to conduct a business, principle of equal treatment) and in this respect violates the EU Law. Therefore, according to the canons of interpretation of EU law, we are convinced that this restriction of use, set out in Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, must be interpreted in conformity with primary EU law; thus, in a broad sense, meaning that the permitted water health claims may be made for all water based foodstuffs, including non-alcoholic beverages (such as fruit and vegetable juices, infusions prepared with water and herbs or parts of plants such as flowers or fruits, tea, coffee and also softdrinks, which typically have a water content between 90 % to 99 %). The question as to whether these water health claims are banned in specific cases, for reasons of consumer protection and health policies, cannot be solved by imposing specific restrictions of use in Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, but by applying, on the basis of a "case by case basis" approach, the general principles and conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, applicable to all health claims; such as nutrient profiles and also the requirement that the use of health claims shall not be false, ambiguous and misleading, nor shall it encourage or condone excess of consumption of a specific food. The legal reasons for this interpretative conclusion are explained in the present article.
机译:根据2012年5月16日的欧盟法规(EU)432/2012,健康声称水有助于维持正常的身体和认知功能,也有助于维持正常的体温调节。但是,作为使用的条件/限制,本法规规定,这两项权利要求“只能用于符合指令2009/54 / EC和/或98/83 / EC的水上”。从该措词尚不清楚,是否意味着这些水健康声明只能用于饮用水和天然矿泉水作为最终产品;或者,如果这意味着也可以针对其他食品(包括非酒精饮料)提出这些要求,只要它们包含大量的饮用水或天然矿泉水作为成分/化合物即可。作者认为,第一个狭义的解释将导致广告禁令与比例原则和经济经营者的基本权利(表达自由,从事专业活动和开展业务的自由,原则不符)不符。平等待遇),并且在这方面违反了欧盟法律。因此,根据欧盟法律的解释规范,我们深信必须根据欧盟主要法律解释《欧盟(EU)432/2012号条例》中规定的使用限制;因此,从广义上讲,这意味着可以针对所有水基食品提出允许的水健康声明,包括非酒精性饮料(例如水果和蔬菜汁,用水和药草或植物部分(如花或水果,茶,咖啡以及软饮料,通常水含量在90%至99%之间)。由于消费者保护和健康政策的原因,在特定情况下是否禁止使用这些水健康声明的问题无法通过在(EU)第432/2012号法规中施加特定的使用限制来解决,而只能通过在基础上适用对于“逐案”方法,适用于所有健康声明的1924/2006号法规(EC)规定的一般原则和条件;例如营养成分,以及要求不得使用虚假,含糊和误导性的健康声明,也不应鼓励或纵容特定食品的过量消费。本文解释了此解释性结论的法律原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号