首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Soil Science >Revisiting the particle-size distribution of soils: comparison of different methods and sample pre-treatments.
【24h】

Revisiting the particle-size distribution of soils: comparison of different methods and sample pre-treatments.

机译:重新审视土壤的粒度分布:比较不同方法和样品预处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The choice of analytical method and sample pretreatment has significant consequences for the shape of particle-size distribution (PSD) frequency curves, and therefore for the evaluation of soil textural parameters. Here, the comparison of several granulometric methods based on different physical principles is presented: wet sieving (WS), based on gravity and the mechanical force of water, was combined with pipette (PP) sedimentation/settling velocity, Micromeritics SediGraph (MS) sedimentation/x-ray attenuation and Coulter Counter (CC) electroresistance particle counting. The Malvern Mastersizer (MM), an instrument based on laser diffraction, was used without WS. Twelve typical temperate-region soil types were chosen for this study on the basis of their mineral composition, organic matter content, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility. The modalities of PSD frequency curves obtained by different methods were compared. The results showed considerably larger clay-fraction contents determined with the sedimentation techniques, PP and MS, than that obtained by CC or MM. Statistical correlation and regression models were used to compare the fractions of clay, silt and sand obtained with different methods. Linear correlations were found in almost all cases, except those comparing clay fractions obtained by CC with those obtained by MM, PP and MS methods. These correlations were non-linear. The observed difference was attributed to the presence of aggregates and/or magnetic properties of soil particles. However, more data are needed to verify this hypothesis. The implications of sample pre-treatment with dispersant and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were evaluated by the MS and CC techniques and observed by the scanning electron microscope. H2O2 was found to be an efficient disaggregating agent. The use of dispersant resulted in the increased amount of the clay fraction measured by the MS method.
机译:分析方法和样品预处理的选择对粒度分布(PSD)频率曲线的形状具有重要意义,因此对土壤质地参数的评估也具有重要意义。在此,对几种基于不同物理原理的粒度分析方法进行了比较:基于重力和水的机械力的湿筛(WS)与移液器(PP)沉降/沉降速度相结合,Micromeritics SediGraph(MS)沉降/ x射线衰减和库尔特计数器(CC)电阻颗粒计数。 Malvern Mastersizer(MM)是基于激光衍射的仪器,不使用WS。本研究根据其矿物成分,有机质含量,电导率和磁化率选择了十二种典型的温带地区土壤类型。比较了用不同方法获得的PSD频率曲线的模态。结果表明,用沉降技术PP和MS测定的粘土馏分含量要比CC或MM更高。统计相关和回归模型用于比较用不同方法获得的粘土,粉砂和砂的比例。在几乎所有情况下都发现线性相关性,除了那些将CC获得的粘土级分与MM,PP和MS方法获得的粘土级分进行比较的线性关系。这些相关是非线性的。观察到的差异归因于聚集体的存在和/或土壤颗粒的磁性。但是,需要更多数据来验证该假设。采用MS和CC技术评估了用分散剂和过氧化氢(H 2 O 2 )预处理样品的意义,并通过扫描电子显微镜对其进行了观察。发现H 2 O 2 是一种有效的分解剂。分散剂的使用导致通过MS方法测量的粘土级分的量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号