首页> 外文期刊>European journal of heart failure: journal of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology >Weaning from inotropic support and concomitant beta-blocker therapy in severely ill heart failure patients: take the time in order to improve prognosis
【24h】

Weaning from inotropic support and concomitant beta-blocker therapy in severely ill heart failure patients: take the time in order to improve prognosis

机译:在重症心力衰竭患者中,从正性肌力支持和伴随的β受体阻滞剂治疗中脱身:花点时间改善预后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Beta-blockers improve the prognosis in heart failure (HF), but their introduction may seem impossible in patients dependent on inotropic support. However, many of these patients can be titrated on beta-blockers, but there is little evidence of successful clinical strategies.We analysed the records of inotropy-dependent patients referred for assessment for heart transplantation. Thirty-six patients (45%) could not be weaned (NW) and underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or transplantation, or died. However, 44 (55%) were successfully weaned (SW). Neither the aetiology (ischaemic vs. non-ischaemic) nor cardiac indexes were different in the, SW as compared with the NW group (2.27 ±0.5 vs. 2.15±0.6L/min/m2). The NW patients had lower LVEF £15 ±5% vs. 19 ±5%, P = 0.001), higher right atrial pressure (12 + 6 vs. 8±6 mmHg, P = 0.02), and more severe mitral regurgitation (P<0.001) than the SW patients. At discharge, 35 of 44 SW patients were receiving beta-blockers. In 29 of them, a beta-blocker could only be initiated or continued during concomitant support with i.v. enoximone for a duration of 14.1 ±7.2 days. Patients discharged on a beta-blocker had an LVAD/transplantation-free cumulative survival of 71 % during a follow-up of 2074 ± 201 days (confidence interval 1679-2470).It takes time to put severely ill HF patients on beta-blockers and it may require bridging with inotropes which are independent of beta-adrenergic receptors. Whether such a strategy may result in a better clinical outcome warrants further research.
机译:β受体阻滞剂可改善心力衰竭(HF)的预后,但对于依赖于正性肌力支持的患者,似乎无法将其引入。但是,这些患者中有许多可以使用β受体阻滞剂进行滴定,但很少有成功的临床策略的证据。我们分析了用于评估心脏移植的正性肌力依赖性患者的记录。 36例患者(45%)无法断奶(NW)并接受了左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入或移植或死亡。但是,有44例(55%)成功断奶(SW)。与西北地区组相比,西南地区的病因(缺血性与非缺血性)和心脏指数均无差异(2.27±0.5 vs. 2.15±0.6L / min / m2)。 NW患者的LVEF £ 15±5%相对较低,而19±5%,P = 0.001),右心房压较高(12 + 6 vs. 8±6 mmHg,P = 0.02),二尖瓣反流严重(P <0.001)。出院时,44例SW患者中有35例正在接受β受体阻滞剂。在其中的29个中,只有在与i.v.恩诺酮持续时间为14.1±7.2天。接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者在2074±201天(置信区间1679-2470)的随访中,无LVAD /无移植的累积存活率为71%。重症HF患者接受β受体阻滞剂需要时间。并且可能需要与独立于β-肾上腺素受体的正性肌醇桥接。这种策略是否可以导致更好的临床结果值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号