首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >Understanding the limits of self-control: Positive affect moderates the impact of task switching on consecutive self-control performance
【24h】

Understanding the limits of self-control: Positive affect moderates the impact of task switching on consecutive self-control performance

机译:了解自我控制的局限性:积极的影响可以减轻任务切换对连续自我控制绩效的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Performing consecutive self-control tasks typically leads to deterioration in self-control performance. This effect can be explained within the strength model of self-control or within a cognitive control perspective. Both theoretical frameworks differ in their predictions with regard to the impact of affect and task characteristics on self-control deterioration within a two-task paradigm. Whereas the strength model predicts decrements in self-control performance whenever both tasks require a limited resource, under a cognitive control perspective, decrements should only occur when people switch to a different response conflict in the second task. Moreover, only the cognitive control model predicts an interaction between task switching and positive affect. In the present research, we investigated this interaction within a two-task paradigm and found evidence that favored a cognitive control interpretation of the results. Positive affect only benefitted consecutive self-control performance if response conflicts in the two tasks were different (resisting sweets followed by a Stroop task). If they were the same (two consecutive Stroop tasks), positive affect impaired self-control performance. These effects were partially replicated in the second study that also examined negative affect, which did not affect self-control performance. We conclude that drawing on cognitive control models could add substantially to research on self-control.
机译:执行连续的自我控制任务通常会导致自我控制性能下降。可以在自我控制的强度模型或认知控制的角度内解释这种效果。两种理论框架在情感和任务特征对双任务范式中自我控制恶化的影响方面的预测不同。尽管强度模型预测每项任务都需要有限的资源,但自我控制绩效会下降,但从认知控制的角度来看,只有当人们在第二项任务中切换到其他响应冲突时,才发生下降。此外,只有认知控制模型可以预测任务切换和积极影响之间的相互作用。在本研究中,我们调查了两任务范式之间的这种相互作用,并发现了有助于对结果进行认知控制解释的证据。如果两个任务中的响应冲突不同(抵制甜食,然后执行Stroop任务),则正面影响只会使连续的自我控制性能受益。如果它们相同(两个连续的Stroop任务),则会对自我控制性能造成负面影响。这些影响在第二项研究中得到了部分复制,该研究还检查了负面影响,但并不影响自我控制能力。我们得出结论,利用认知控制模型可以大大增加自我控制的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号