首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >To teach or to tell? Consequences of receiving help from experts and peers
【24h】

To teach or to tell? Consequences of receiving help from experts and peers

机译:教还是讲?从专家和同行那里获得帮助的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research has stressed the positive effects of receiving autonomy-oriented help over dependency-oriented help but has overlooked a potential downside in terms of recipients' evaluations of the helper. Participants in the current experiment (n = 77) requested help while working on difficult puzzles and received either autonomy-or dependency-oriented help from either an expert or a peer. In line with previous findings, receiving autonomy-oriented help led to more self-competence and positive feelings than dependency-oriented help. However, in support of our prediction, participants also felt angrier, had less respect for and less trust in the peer who provided autonomy-oriented help than the peer who provided dependency-oriented help. No differences in the evaluation of the expert helper were found. These findings highlight the importance of considering both the helpers' characteristics and the type of help provided when investigating the psychological consequences of receiving help.
机译:先前的研究强调了接受面向自主的帮助比面向依赖的帮助的积极作用,但在接受者对帮助者的评估方面却忽略了潜在的不利因素。当前实验的参与者(n = 77)在解决难题时寻求帮助,并从专家或同伴那里获得了自主性或依赖性的帮助。与以前的研究结果相一致,与以依赖为导向的帮助相比,获得以自治为导向的帮助可带来更多的自我竞争和积极的感受。但是,为支持我们的预测,与提供依赖导向帮助的同龄人相比,参与者还感到愤怒,较少尊重和信任。在专家助手的评估中未发现差异。这些发现凸显了在调查接受帮助的心理后果时,必须同时考虑帮助者的特征和提供的帮助类型的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号