首页> 外文期刊>European journal of social psychology >Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of 'geneticism'
【24h】

Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of 'geneticism'

机译:为什么社会主导地位的取向会随着大学对社会科学的接触而减少?制度社会化的影响和“遗传论”的中介作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why does university exposure to a hierarchy-attenuating (HA) academic major (e.g., social science) lead to a decrease in anti-egalitarianism and group domination (social dominance orientation, SDO)? The reason for this well-documented phenomenon remains unclear. In the social sciences, the origins of differences in both behavior and personality are attributed more to social and environmental factors than to genetic ones. We hypothesized that the normative and informational influences of this academic major would lead to perceptions that genes have a less important role than nurture in the shaping of human behavior and personality. Our main hypothesis was confirmed. Decreased SDO among psychology students was mediated significantly by a decrease in belief in genetic determinism, the factor we called "geneticism."
机译:为什么大学接触等级递减(HA)学术专业(例如社会科学)会导致反平均主义和群体统治(社会优势取向,SDO)下降?这种现象有据可查的原因尚不清楚。在社会科学中,行为和人格差异的起源更多地归因于社会和环境因素,而不是遗传因素。我们假设,该专业的规范和信息影响将导致人们认为基因在塑造人类行为和性格方面的作用不如培育。我们的主要假设得到了证实。心理学学生中SDO的降低主要是由于人们对遗传决定论(我们称为“遗传论”)的信念下降所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号