首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Soil Science >Relevance and limitations of biogenic and physicogenic classification: a comparison of approaches for differentiating the origin of soil aggregates
【24h】

Relevance and limitations of biogenic and physicogenic classification: a comparison of approaches for differentiating the origin of soil aggregates

机译:生物成因和物理成因分类的相关性和局限性:区分土壤团聚体来源的方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although freshly formed or unaltered biogenic aggregates are easily recognized, identifying the origin of aggregates altered by physical and biological processes remains empirical and prone to error. The aim of this study was to distinguish between biogenic (BIO) and physicogenic (PHYS) aggregates in various states of fragmentation or size classes using visual, physical and chemical characteristics. Casts produced by Amynthas khami (BIO) and surrounding soil aggregates without visible biological activity (PHYS) were left to disaggregate by natural rainfall events and then separated into five size classes of >10, 10-5, 5-2, 2-0.5 and <0.5 mm. We then analysed aggregate morphology, elemental and stable isotope composition and soil stability, and used near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to determine their chemical characteristics. Although visual assessment is the method most commonly used in the field to distinguish between BIO and PHYS, our study found that the results obtained were always prone to error and that the classification was arbitrary for BIO and PHYS aggregates smaller than 5 and 2 mm in size, respectively. Soil structural stability was only useful for identifying BIO aggregates larger than 2 mm. While C content and tp#pdC in BIO were always different from PHYS, regardless of soil aggregate size, N content and tp#eN were similar. NIRS was the most effective method because it clearly discriminated soil aggregates on the basis of size and origin. The NIRS characteristics of BIO were also more uniform than those of PHYS, suggesting that BIO aggregates have a simpler organization and as a consequence more homogeneous ecological functions. Thus, our findings suggest that information may be lost when only the physical aspect of aggregates is used to quantify the activity of ecosystem engineers in soil. After fragmentation, BIO aggregates become hidden and although it may be impossible to distinguish them visually from PHYS aggregates they retain some of their specific chemical characteristics
机译:尽管很容易识别出新鲜形成的或未改变的生物聚集体,但凭经验确定由物理和生物过程改变的聚集体的起源仍然是经验性的,并且容易出错。这项研究的目的是使用视觉,物理和化学特征,区分处于碎片或大小类别的各种状态的生物(BIO)和物理(PHYS)聚集体。由Amynthas khami(BIO)生产的铸件和周围无可见生物活性的土壤团聚体(PHYS)在自然降雨事件下被分解,然后分成> 10、10-5、5-2、2-0.5和5的五个尺寸等级。 <0.5毫米。然后,我们分析了聚集体形态,元素和稳定的同位素组成以及土壤稳定性,并使用近红外光谱(NIRS)来确定其化学特征。尽管视觉评估是本领域最常用的区分BIO和PHYS的方法,但我们的研究发现,获得的结果总是容易出错,并且对于尺寸小于5和2 mm的BIO和PHYS聚合体,分类是任意的, 分别。土壤结构稳定性仅可用于识别大于2 mm的BIO聚集体。尽管BIO中的C含量和tp#pdC始终与PHYS不同,但无论土壤团聚体大小如何,N含量和tp#eN都相似。 NIRS是最有效的方法,因为它可以根据大小和来源清楚地区分土壤聚集体。 BIO的NIRS特征也比PHYS更为均匀,这表明BIO聚集体的组织更简单,因此生态功能更加均一。因此,我们的发现表明,仅将聚集体的物理方面用于量化土壤中生态系统工程师的活动时,信息可能会丢失。破碎后,BIO聚集体被隐藏起来,尽管可能无法从视觉上将其与PHYS聚集体区分开,但它们保留了一些特定的化学特征

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号