...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Radiology >Differences in coronary artery disease by CT angiography between patients developing unstable angina pectoris vs. major adverse cardiac events
【24h】

Differences in coronary artery disease by CT angiography between patients developing unstable angina pectoris vs. major adverse cardiac events

机译:发展为不稳定型心绞痛的患者与主要不良心脏事件之间的CT血管造影冠状动脉疾病差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective CT angiography (CTA) has prognostic value in patients. But it is unknown whether differences in atherosclerosis by CTA predict the development of unstable angina pectoris (UAP) vs. major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods We followed patients undergoing CTA as part of their acute chest pain work-up. Primary outcome was the development of UAP or MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization) during a minimum follow-up of 12-months. CTAs were assessed for extent and composition of coronary plaque and stenosis. Ordinal regression with a 3-level outcome (no events, UAP, MACE) was applied. Results Among 315 patients, 22 developed UAP and 31 MACE. While UAP patients had higher atherosclerosis burden with respect to all assessed features compared to patients with no events (p ≤ 0.02), only mixed plaque extent was significantly different between UAP and MACE patients (p = 0.02). The odds ratio was 4.55 for being in a higher disease-level comparing patients with low extent to those with no mixed plaque, and 3.02 comparing patients with high to those with low. These findings remained after adjustments for potential confounders. Conclusion The extent of mixed coronary plaque is different between patients who develop UAP vs. MACE, supporting the hypothesis that it is a more culprit morphology.
机译:客观CT血管造影(CTA)在患者中具有预后价值。但是,尚不清楚CTA的动脉粥样硬化差异是否可以预测不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)与主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的关系。方法我们追踪了接受CTA治疗的患者,作为他们急性胸痛检查的一部分。主要结局是在至少12个月的随访期间发生UAP或MACE(心脏死亡,心肌梗塞,血运重建)。评估CTAs冠状动脉斑块和狭窄的程度和组成。应用具有三级结果的序数回归(无事件,UAP,MACE)。结果在315例患者中,有22例发展为UAP,31例为MACE。与没有事件的患者相比,UAP患者的所有评估特征具有更高的动脉粥样硬化负担(p≤0.02),但UAP和MACE患者之间只有混合斑块程度显着不同(p = 0.02)。在疾病水平较高的人群中,低程度患者与无混合斑块的患者相比,优势比为4.55,高水平患者与低水平患者的比值比为3.02。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整之后,这些发现仍然存在。结论发生UAP与MACE的患者混合冠状动脉斑块的程度不同,支持这一假说是罪魁祸首形态的假说。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号